Literature DB >> 20713037

Optimization and robustness of blood tests for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Paul Calès1, Jérôme Boursier, Sandrine Bertrais, Frédéric Oberti, Yves Gallois, Isabelle Fouchard-Hubert, Nina Dib, Jean-Pierre Zarski, Marie Christine Rousselet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To optimize the performance and feasibility of fibrosis blood tests and evaluate their robustness. DESIGN AND METHODS: The derivation population included 1056 HCV patients with liver biopsy and blood markers. Validation populations included 984 patients with various viral hepatitis causes, and Fibroscan and/or liver biopsy and/or blood markers.
RESULTS: The bootstrap method validated the markers of the original FibroMeter(2G), but not those of Fibrotest and Hepascore, and provided a hyaluronate-free FibroMeter(3G). AUROCs for significant fibrosis were: FibroMeter(2G): 0.853 vs. FibroMeter(3G): 0.851, p=0.489. Compared to FibroMeter(2G), FibroMeter(3G) had a significantly higher patient rate with predictive values ≥90% for significant fibrosis. Accuracy for fibrosis stage classification was: Fibrotest: 37.9%, FibroMeter(2G): 74.9%, and FibroMeter(3G): 86.9% (p<10(-3)).
CONCLUSION: The bootstrap method validated FibroMeter(2G) and provided a cheaper and more feasible hyaluronate-free FibroMeter(3G) with comparable performance. Compared to binary diagnosis, fibrosis stage classification increased discrimination, with an increased accuracy to 87% for FibroMeter(3G).
Copyright © 2010 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemist. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20713037     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  12 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of liver disease (noninvasive methods).

Authors:  Shruti H Mehta; Geoffrey C Buckle
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 2.  Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: Between prediction/prevention of outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Cristina Stasi; Stefano Milani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Evaluation and comparison of six noninvasive tests for prediction of significant or advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Katharina Staufer; Emina Halilbasic; Walter Spindelboeck; Magdalena Eilenberg; Gerhard Prager; Vanessa Stadlbauer; Andreas Posch; Petra Munda; Rodrig Marculescu; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Judith Stift; Carolin Lackner; Michael Trauner; Rudolf E Stauber
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  A brief review on molecular, genetic and imaging techniques for HCV fibrosis evaluation.

Authors:  Waqar Ahmad; Bushra Ijaz; Sana Gull; Sultan Asad; Saba Khaliq; Shah Jahan; Muhammad T Sarwar; Humera Kausar; Aleena Sumrin; Imran Shahid; Sajida Hassan
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Comparison of accuracy of fibrosis degree classifications by liver biopsy and non-invasive tests in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Jérôme Boursier; Sandrine Bertrais; Frédéric Oberti; Yves Gallois; Isabelle Fouchard-Hubert; Marie-Christine Rousselet; Jean-Pierre Zarski; Paul Calès
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Should HFE p.C282Y homozygotes with moderately elevated serum ferritin be treated? A randomised controlled trial comparing iron reduction with sham treatment (Mi-iron).

Authors:  Sim Yee Ong; Lara Dolling; Jeannette L Dixon; Amanda J Nicoll; Lyle C Gurrin; Michelle Wolthuizen; Erica M Wood; Greg J Anderson; Grant A Ramm; Katrina J Allen; John K Olynyk; Darrell Crawford; Jennifer Kava; Louise E Ramm; Paul Gow; Simon Durrant; Lawrie W Powell; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Impact of contacting study authors to obtain additional data for systematic reviews: diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Shelley S Selph; Alexander D Ginsburg; Roger Chou
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-19

Review 8.  Diagnosis and staging of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: comparison and critical overview of current strategies.

Authors:  Leandro César Mendes; Raquel Sb Stucchi; Aline G Vigani
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2018-04-03

9.  Fibrosis assessment using FibroMeter combined to first generation tests in hepatitis C.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Chindamo; Jerome Boursier; Ronir Raggio Luiz; Isabelle Fouchard-Hubert; Vera Lúcia Nunes Pannain; João Marcello de Araújo Neto; Henrique Sérgio Moraes Coelho; Renata de Mello Perez; Paul Calès; Cristiane Alves Villela-Nogueira
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-02-28

10.  A single blood test adjusted for different liver fibrosis targets improves fibrosis staging and especially cirrhosis diagnosis.

Authors:  Paul Calès; Jérôme Boursier; Frédéric Oberti; Valérie Moal; Isabelle Fouchard Hubert; Sandrine Bertrais; Gilles Hunault; Marie Christine Rousselet
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2018-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.