Literature DB >> 20712440

Marginal bone loss around implants supporting fixed restorations.

Emre Mumcu1, Hakan Bilhan, Ali Cekici.   

Abstract

A key criterion of success following dental implants is the marginal bone level. Long-term clinical and radiographic evaluation is necessary to test the results of in vitro studies investigating how cantilevering of restorations or implant size affect bone level changes around implants. There is no consensus on the effect of several variables such as age, gender, implant size, and cantilever prostheses on marginal bone levels around fixed dentures supported by dental implants. Patients who received cemented, fixed restorations supported by implants and who were examined in routine recall sessions 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after loading were included in the study group. Comparative bone level measurements were obtained from images of radiographs at ×20 magnification using the CorelDraw 11.0 software program. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and 1-way analysis of variance. In the 36-month observation period, there were no incidences of implant failure, excessive bone loss around implants, or peri-implant inflammation. One hundred twenty-six implants in 36 patients were evaluated, and the effect of several factors on marginal bone loss (MBL) during the 36 months after loading was analyzed statistically. There was no significant relationship between MBL and implant length or diameter, whereas age, gender, and cantilevers affected bone loss rates. MBL was elevated in older and female patients as well as in patients who received cantilevers. In cases of limiting anatomic conditions, short and/or narrow implants should be preferred over cantilever extensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20712440     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  7 in total

1.  Radiological evaluation of the Cresco system in combination with Osseospeed implants: a preliminary 3-year report.

Authors:  N Baldini; M DE Sanctis; M C Cagidiaco; P Balleri; F Vignoletti; C Goracci; M Ferrari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

Review 2.  Two-Dimensional Analysis of Digital Images through Vector Graphic Editors in Dentistry: New Calibration and Analysis Protocol Based on a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Samuel Rodríguez-López; Matías Ferrán Escobedo Martínez; Luis Junquera; María García-Pola
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies.

Authors:  Julius Maminskas; Algirdas Puisys; Ritva Kuoppala; Aune Raustia; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

4.  Finite element analysis of stress concentration between surface coated implants and non surface coated implants - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Tammineedi Sv Satyanarayana; Rathika Rai; E Subramanyam; T Illango; Vishwabharathi Mutyala; Rajesh Akula
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-08-01

5.  Effect of Smoking and Locations of Dental Implants on Peri-Implant Parameters: 3-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Emre Mumcu; Süleyman Çağatay Dayan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-08-15

6.  Marginal Bone Level Evaluation of Fixed Partial Dental Prostheses Using Preformed Stock versus CAD/CAM Customized Abutments.

Authors:  Hui-Ting Lin; Jerry Chin-Yi Lin; Eisner Salamanca; Odontuya Dorj; Yu-Hwa Pan; Yi-Fan Wu; Yung-Szu Hsu; Chih-Yuan Fang; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-27

7.  Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis.

Authors:  Muhammad-Hasan Hameed; Farhan-Raza Khan; Robia Ghafoor; Syed-Iqbal Azam
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-10-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.