Literature DB >> 20712261

Levobupivacaine vs. racemic bupivacaine in peribulbar anaesthesia: a randomized double blind study in ophthalmic surgery.

E Pacella1, S Collini, F Pacella, D C Piraino, V Santamaria, R A De Blasi.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Authors examine the employement of a new anaesthetic agent, levobupivacaine 0.50% (S - enantiomer of racemic mixture of bupivacaine), for peribulbar anaesthesia in a randomized double blind study vs. racemic bupivacaine 0.50% alone or in association with hyaluronidase 10 IU x ml(-1).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 patients were divided into four groups of 30 each: group L (levobupivacaine 0.50%), group B (racemic bupivacaine 0.50%), group LH (levobupivacaine-hyaluronidase 10 IU x ml(-1)), group BH (racemic bupivacaine-hyaluronidase 10 IU x ml(-1)).
RESULTS: The onset-time (14 +/- 3.2 min vs. 13 +/- 4.8 min) and the duration of anaesthesia (195 +/- 34.2 vs. 204 +/- 37.6) were similar. The ocular akinesia was evaluated with an 8 point system: it was considered sufficient for surgery with values of less than 5 points. The association with hyaluronidase increased the spread of local anaesthetics (76.6% of group LH, 73.3% of group BH) with local anaesthetics alone (60% of group L, 56.6% of group B). Moderate hypotension (<30% baseline) was reported in 3 patients (10%) of group L, 2 (6.6%) of group B, 1 (3.3%) of group LH and 2 (6.6%) of group BH. Statistical analysis (Student-Newman-Keuls test) was significant between group L vs. BH, B vs. BH and LH vs. BH as regards onset-time of anaesthesia; between group B vs. LH, B vs. BH and L vs. LH for the duration of anaesthesia. Chi square test for the general akinesia score showed significant results in group L vs. LH (p=0.043) and B vs. LH 8P =0.018); as regards the score 0, test reported significant values between groups B vs. LH (p=0.004) and B vs. BH (p=0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion levobupivacaine, a longlasting local anaesthetic with limited cardio and neurotoxicity, might be useful for vitreoretinal surgery in elderly patients, compared with general anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20712261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci        ISSN: 1128-3602            Impact factor:   3.507


  5 in total

Review 1.  Expanding lysine industry: industrial biomanufacturing of lysine and its derivatives.

Authors:  Jie Cheng; Peng Chen; Andong Song; Dan Wang; Qinhong Wang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Comparison of levobupivacaine 0.5% or bupivacaine 0.5% both in a mixture with lidocaine 2% for superficial extraconal blockade.

Authors:  Nauman Ahmad; Abdul Zahoor; Abdullah Al Assiri; Sabah Al Jastaneiah; Waleed Riad
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

3.  Efficacy and safety of 0.5% levobupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia.

Authors:  Elena Pacella; Fernanda Pacella; Fabiana Troisi; Domenico Dell'edera; Paolo Tuchetti; Tommaso Lenzi; Saul Collini
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-21

Review 4.  Safety of liposome extended-release bupivacaine for postoperative pain control.

Authors:  Juan Portillo; Nawal Kamar; Somayah Melibary; Eduardo Quevedo; Sergio Bergese
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Flap motility as a sign of posterior capsule rupture in peripherally extended anterior capsular tears.

Authors:  Rohit Om Parkash; Shruti Mahajan; Vinod Biala; Tushya Om Parkash; Alhaj F Tasneem
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.