Literature DB >> 20711934

Public perceptions of natural resource damages and the resources that require restoration.

Joanna Burger1.   

Abstract

The public and health professionals are interested in restoring degraded ecosystem to provide goods and services. This study examined public perceptions in coastal New York and New Jersey about who is responsible for restoration of resources, which resources should be restored, by whom, and do they know the meaning of natural resource damage assessment (NRDA). More than 98% felt that resources should be restored; more (40%) thought the government should restore them, rather than the responsible party (23%). The highest rated resources were endangered wildlife, fish, mammals, and clams/crabs. Only 2% of respondents knew what NRDA meant. These data indicate that people felt strongly that resources should be restored and varied in who should restore them, suggesting that governmental agencies must clarify the relationship between chemical discharges, resource injury, NRDA, and restoration of those resources to produce clean air and water, fish and wildlife, and recreational opportunities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20711934      PMCID: PMC4041149          DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2010.485045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  7 in total

1.  Natural resource damage assessments in the United States: rules and procedures for compensation from spills of hazardous substances and oil in waterways under US jurisdiction.

Authors:  Douglas D Ofiara
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  A framework for net environmental benefit analysis for remediation or restoration of contaminated sites.

Authors:  Rebecca A Efroymson; Joseph P Nicolette; Glenn W Suter
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Scientific research, stakeholders, and policy: continuing dialogue during research on radionuclides on Amchitka Island, Alaska.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Charles W Powers; David S Kosson; John Halverson; Gregory Siekaniec; Anne Morkill; Robert Patrick; Lawrence K Duffy; David Barnes
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 4.  Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Charles W Powers
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Calculating the cost of natural resource damage.

Authors:  R Renner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Science, policy, and stakeholders: developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; David S Kosson; Charles W Powers; Barry Friedlander; John Eichelberger; David Barnes; Lawrence K Duffy; Stephen C Jewett; Conrad D Volz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  The effect on ecological systems of remediation to protect human health.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 9.308

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.