Literature DB >> 20711777

Variability in the dynamics of mortality and immobility responses of freshwater arthropods exposed to chlorpyrifos.

Mascha N Rubach1, Steven J H Crum, Paul J Van den Brink.   

Abstract

The species sensitivity distribution (SSD) concept is an important probabilistic tool for environmental risk assessment (ERA) and accounts for differences in species sensitivity to different chemicals. The SSD model assumes that the sensitivity of the species included is randomly distributed. If this assumption is violated, indicator values, such as the 50% hazardous concentration, can potentially change dramatically. Fundamental research, however, has discovered and described specific mechanisms and factors influencing toxicity and sensitivity for several model species and chemical combinations. Further knowledge on how these mechanisms and factors relate to toxicologic standard end points would be beneficial for ERA. For instance, little is known about how the processes of toxicity relate to the dynamics of standard toxicity end points and how these may vary across species. In this article, we discuss the relevance of immobilization and mortality as end points for effects of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos on 14 freshwater arthropods in the context of ERA. For this, we compared the differences in response dynamics during 96 h of exposure with the two end points across species using dose response models and SSDs. The investigated freshwater arthropods vary less in their immobility than in their mortality response. However, differences in observed immobility and mortality were surprisingly large for some species even after 96 h of exposure. As expected immobility was consistently the more sensitive end point and less variable across the tested species and may therefore be considered as the relevant end point for population of SSDs and ERA, although an immobile animal may still potentially recover. This is even more relevant because an immobile animal is unlikely to survive for long periods under field conditions. This and other such considerations relevant to the decision-making process for a particular end point are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20711777      PMCID: PMC3070881          DOI: 10.1007/s00244-010-9582-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  22 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; J S Jaworska
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Lorraine Maltby; Naomi Blake; Theo C M Brock; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 3.  Predicting effects on aquatic organisms from fluctuating or pulsed exposure to pesticides.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Alistair Boxall; Colin Brown
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Exposure of the eggs to 17alpha-methyl testosterone reduced hatching success and growth and elicited teratogenic effects in postembryonic life stages of crayfish.

Authors:  Günter Vogt
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Modeling combined effects of pulsed exposure to carbaryl and chlorpyrifos on Gammarus pulex.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Alistair B A Boxall; Colin D Brown
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Novel view on predicting acute toxicity: decomposing toxicity data in species vulnerability and chemical potency.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager; Leo Posthuma; Dick de Zwart; Dik van de Meent
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Time-to-event analyses of ecotoxicity data.

Authors:  M C Newman; J T McCloskey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 8.  Anthropogenic pollutants: a threat to ecosystem sustainability?

Authors:  S M Rhind
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part I. Acute toxicity of five chemicals.

Authors:  F J Dwyer; F L Mayer; L C Sappington; D R Buckler; C M Bridges; I E Greer; D K Hardesty; C E Henke; C G Ingersoll; J L Kunz; D W Whites; T Augspurger; D R Mount; K Hattala; G N Neuderfer
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Review of the toxicology of chlorpyrifos with an emphasis on human exposure and neurodevelopment.

Authors:  David L Eaton; Robert B Daroff; Herman Autrup; James Bridges; Patricia Buffler; Lucio G Costa; Joseph Coyle; Guy McKhann; William C Mobley; Lynn Nadel; Diether Neubert; Rolf Schulte-Hermann; Peter S Spencer
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.635

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Marmorkrebs: natural crayfish clone as emerging model for various biological disciplines.

Authors:  Günter Vogt
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Toxicity prediction and assessment of an environmentally realistic pesticide mixture to Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata.

Authors:  E Silva; C Martins; A S Pereira; S Loureiro; M J Cerejeira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Contaminant exposure effects in a changing climate: how multiple stressors can multiply exposure effects in the amphipod Hyalella azteca.

Authors:  Simone Hasenbein; Helen Poynton; Richard E Connon
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Effects of intra- and interspecific competition on the sensitivity of Daphnia magna populations to the fungicide carbendazim.

Authors:  Ana Isabel Del Arco; Andreu Rico; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  A comparison of the sublethal and lethal toxicity of four pesticides in Hyalella azteca and Chironomus dilutus.

Authors:  Simone Hasenbein; Richard E Connon; Sharon P Lawler; Juergen Geist
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Environmental Distribution, Metabolic Fate, and Degradation Mechanism of Chlorpyrifos: Recent and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Rahul S Bhende; Upasana Jhariya; Shweta Srivastava; Sakina Bombaywala; Sanchita Das; Nishant A Dafale
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.926

7.  Species traits as predictors for intrinsic sensitivity of aquatic invertebrates to the insecticide chlorpyrifos.

Authors:  Mascha N Rubach; Donald J Baird; Marie-Claire Boerwinkel; Stephen J Maund; Ivo Roessink; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  The influence of insecticide exposure and environmental stimuli on the movement behaviour and dispersal of a freshwater isopod.

Authors:  Jacqueline Augusiak; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Effects of Endosulfan on Predator-Prey Interactions Between Catfish and Schistosoma Host Snails.

Authors:  Concillia Monde; Stephen Syampungani; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Sensitivity of Ethiopian aquatic macroinvertebrates to the pesticides endosulfan and diazinon, compared to literature data.

Authors:  Berhan M Teklu; Negussie Retta; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.