PURPOSE: Tumour angiogenesis is an independent and strong prognostic factor in early breast carcinoma. We performed this study to investigate the ability of (18)F-FDG to detect angiogenesis in early breast carcinoma using PET/CT. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with early (T1-T2) breast carcinoma were recruited prospectively for 18F-FDG PET/CT. The PET/CT data were used to calculate whole tumour maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean)). All patients underwent subsequent surgery without prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The excised tumour underwent immunohistochemistry for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CD105 and glucose transporter protein 1 (GLUT1). RESULTS: The SUV(max) showed the following correlation with tumour histology: CD105: r = 0.60, p = 0.005; GLUT1: r = 0.21, p = 0.373; VEGF: r = -0.16, p = 0.496. The SUV(mean) showed the following correlation with tumour histology: CD105: r = 0.65, p = 0.002; GLUT1: r = 0.34, p = 0.144; VEGF: r = -0.18, p = 0.443 CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG uptake is highly significantly associated with angiogenesis as measured by the immunohistochemistry with CD105 for new vessel formation. Given that tumour angiogenesis is an important prognostic indicator and a predictor of treatment response, (18)F-FDG PET may have a role in the management of primary breast cancer patients even in early-stage disease.
PURPOSE: Tumour angiogenesis is an independent and strong prognostic factor in early breast carcinoma. We performed this study to investigate the ability of (18)F-FDG to detect angiogenesis in early breast carcinoma using PET/CT. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with early (T1-T2) breast carcinoma were recruited prospectively for 18F-FDG PET/CT. The PET/CT data were used to calculate whole tumour maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean)). All patients underwent subsequent surgery without prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The excised tumour underwent immunohistochemistry for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CD105 and glucose transporter protein 1 (GLUT1). RESULTS: The SUV(max) showed the following correlation with tumour histology: CD105: r = 0.60, p = 0.005; GLUT1: r = 0.21, p = 0.373; VEGF: r = -0.16, p = 0.496. The SUV(mean) showed the following correlation with tumour histology: CD105: r = 0.65, p = 0.002; GLUT1: r = 0.34, p = 0.144; VEGF: r = -0.18, p = 0.443 CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG uptake is highly significantly associated with angiogenesis as measured by the immunohistochemistry with CD105 for new vessel formation. Given that tumour angiogenesis is an important prognostic indicator and a predictor of treatment response, (18)F-FDG PET may have a role in the management of primary breast cancer patients even in early-stage disease.
Authors: Reinhard Bos; Jacobus J M van Der Hoeven; Elsken van Der Wall; Petra van Der Groep; Paul J van Diest; Emile F I Comans; Urvi Joshi; Gregg L Semenza; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Carla F M Molthoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David A Mankoff; Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Erin K Schubert; Jeffrey Tseng; Thomas J Lawton; Hannah M Linden; Robert B Livingston Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Vincent Vinh-Hung; Hendrik Everaert; Jan Lamote; Mia Voordeckers; Hilde van Parijs; Marian Vanhoeij; Guy Verfaillie; Christel Fontaine; Hansjoerg Vees; Osman Ratib; Georges Vlastos; Mark De Ridder Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hendra Budiawan; Gi Jeong Cheon; Hyung-Jun Im; Soo Jin Lee; Jin Chul Paeng; Keon Wook Kang; June-Key Chung; Dong Soo Lee Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-08-21
Authors: Vicky Goh; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Alec Engledow; Manu Shastry; Raymondo Endozo; Jacqui Peck; Marie Meagher; Stuart A Taylor; Steve Halligan; Ashley M Groves Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marjan S Bolouri; Sjoerd G Elias; Dorota J Wisner; Spencer C Behr; Randall A Hawkins; Sachiko A Suzuki; Krysta S Banfield; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Manu Shastry; Kenneth A Miles; Thida Win; Sam M Janes; Raymond Endozo; Marie Meagher; Peter J Ell; Ashley M Groves Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Irene A Burger; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Aditya Apte; Bradley J Beattie; John L Humm; Mithat Gonen; Steven M Larson; C Ross Schmidtlein Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 2.408