Literature DB >> 20711166

Incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek population.

Anastasia Fardi1, Athena Kondylidou-Sidira, Zaki Bachour, Nikolaos Parisis, Anastasios Tsirlis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of impacted and supernumerary teeth, apart from third molars. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 1.239 panoramic radiographs taken of patients who presented to the Department of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Implantology and Radiology at the School of Dentistry of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece between 1991 and 1999. The panoramic radiographs and dental records were reviewed in order to determine whether there were impacted or supernumerary teeth. Observations were also made on the space in dentition, corresponding to the position of each impacted tooth, the lack of space for tooth eruption, transmigration, retained primary teeth or prosthetic restoration.
RESULTS: A total of 170 (13.7%) patients presented with at least one impacted tooth. None of them had an impacted incisor. Impacted canines were the most prevalent dental anomaly (8.8%), followed by impacted premolars (2.2%). Supernumerary teeth (1.8%) and impacted molars (1%) were the least common anomalies. Among the 225 impacted teeth, the most frequently affected teeth were the canines (59.6%), followed by premolars (19.1%), and supernumerary teeth (15.1%), while the incidence of impacted molars was substantially lower (6.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently impacted teeth were the maxillary canine, the second mandibular premolar and the second mandibular molar. The majority of the supernumerary teeth consisted of mesiodens. There was space in the dentition of each impacted tooth in 29.3% of the cases examined; there was a retained primary tooth in 25.1%, and a prosthetic restoration had been constructed in 24%. Insufficient space for the eruption of the impacted tooth and transmigration was observed in 17.3% and 4.2% of the cases, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20711166     DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal        ISSN: 1698-4447


  46 in total

1.  Impacted maxillary second premolars: a report of four cases.

Authors:  Bhari Sharanesha Manjunatha; Shivashankar Chikkaramaiah; Pritam Panja; Nagesh Koratagere
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-10-15

2.  Lateral incisor agenesis, canine impaction and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a South European male population.

Authors:  Konstantina Delli; Christos Livas; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07

3.  Cleft palate with/without cleft lip in French children: radiographic evaluation of prevalence, location and coexistence of dental anomalies inside and outside cleft region.

Authors:  Francesca Mangione; Laure Nguyen; Nathalie Foumou; Emmanuelle Bocquet; Elisabeth Dursun
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Molecular genetics of supernumerary tooth formation.

Authors:  Xiu-Ping Wang; Jiabing Fan
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Developmental dental anomalies assessed by panoramic radiographs in a Greek orthodontic population sample.

Authors:  G Pallikaraki; I Sifakakis; S Gizani; M Makou; A Mitsea
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-09-07

6.  Prevalence of impacted teeth and supernumerary teeth by radiographic evaluation in three Latin American countries: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sindy Tetay-Salgado; Luis-Ernesto Arriola-Guillén; Gustavo-Armando Ruíz-Mora; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Yalil-Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of saudi arabia.

Authors:  Ahmed R Afify; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-06-19

8.  Impacted Canine in Orthodontic Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Bashu Dev Pant; Anjana Rajbhandari; Resina Pradhan; Manju Bajracharya; Pushkar Manandhar; Surendra Maharjan; Dilli Bahadur Pun; Barun Kumar Sah
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 0.556

9.  Maxillary canine impaction in orthodontic patients with and without agenesis: a cross-sectional radiographic study.

Authors:  Evangelia Lempesi; Marina Karamolegkou; Nikolaos Pandis; Maria Mavragani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Skeletal features in patient affected by maxillary canine impaction.

Authors:  Emanuele Mercuri; Michele Cassetta; Costanza Cavallini; Donatella Vicari; Rosalia Leonardi; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.