OBJECTIVES: To identify the respiratory viral pathogens associated with acute lower respiratory tract infection in critically ill pediatric patients by using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and compare results with those of direct fluorescence antibody assay testing. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with severe respiratory symptoms consistent with viral lower respiratory tract infection. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory samples of pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with severe respiratory symptoms between January 2008 and July 2009 were tested with direct fluorescence antibody assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. MAIN RESULTS: At least one viral agent was detected in 70.5% of specimens by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and in 16.5% by direct fluorescence antibody assay (p < .001). Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction increased the total viral yield five-fold compared to direct fluorescence antibody assay. Rhinovirus was the most commonly identified virus (41.6%). For viruses included in the direct fluorescence antibody assay panel, direct fluorescence antibody assay had a sensitivity of 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.25-0.61) and a specificity of 1 (95% confidence interval 0.86-1.00) compared with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Coinfections were not uncommon, in particular with rhinovirus, and these patients tended to have higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Direct fluorescence antibody assay testing is a suboptimal method for the detection of respiratory viruses in critically ill children with lower respiratory tract infection. Given the importance of a prompt and accurate viral diagnosis for this group of patients, we suggest that real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction becomes part of the routine diagnostic algorithm in critically ill children when a viral etiology is suspected, even if conventional tests yield a negative result.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the respiratory viral pathogens associated with acute lower respiratory tract infection in critically ill pediatricpatients by using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and compare results with those of direct fluorescence antibody assay testing. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with severe respiratory symptoms consistent with viral lower respiratory tract infection. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory samples of pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with severe respiratory symptoms between January 2008 and July 2009 were tested with direct fluorescence antibody assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. MAIN RESULTS: At least one viral agent was detected in 70.5% of specimens by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and in 16.5% by direct fluorescence antibody assay (p < .001). Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction increased the total viral yield five-fold compared to direct fluorescence antibody assay. Rhinovirus was the most commonly identified virus (41.6%). For viruses included in the direct fluorescence antibody assay panel, direct fluorescence antibody assay had a sensitivity of 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.25-0.61) and a specificity of 1 (95% confidence interval 0.86-1.00) compared with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Coinfections were not uncommon, in particular with rhinovirus, and these patients tended to have higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Direct fluorescence antibody assay testing is a suboptimal method for the detection of respiratory viruses in critically ill children with lower respiratory tract infection. Given the importance of a prompt and accurate viral diagnosis for this group of patients, we suggest that real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction becomes part of the routine diagnostic algorithm in critically ill children when a viral etiology is suspected, even if conventional tests yield a negative result.
Authors: Jonathan M Mansbach; Pedro A Piedra; Stephen J Teach; Ashley F Sullivan; Tate Forgey; Sunday Clark; Janice A Espinola; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-08
Authors: Desmond W Cox; Siew-Kim Khoo; Guicheng Zhang; Katie Lindsay; Anthony D Keil; Geoff Knight; James E Gern; Ingrid A Laing; Joelene Bizzintino; Peter N Le Souëf Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Carmen L Charlton; Esther Babady; Christine C Ginocchio; Todd F Hatchette; Robert C Jerris; Yan Li; Mike Loeffelholz; Yvette S McCarter; Melissa B Miller; Susan Novak-Weekley; Audrey N Schuetz; Yi-Wei Tang; Ray Widen; Steven J Drews Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Hyung-Jun Kim; Sun Mi Choi; Jinwoo Lee; Young Sik Park; Chang-Hoon Lee; Jae-Joon Yim; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Young Whan Kim; Sung Koo Han; Sang-Min Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sandra A Asner; Michelle E Science; Dat Tran; Marek Smieja; Arnaud Merglen; Dominik Mertz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lien Anh Ha Do; Juliet E Bryant; Anh Tuan Tran; Bach Hue Nguyen; Thi Thu Loan Tran; Quynh Huong Tran; Quoc Bao Vo; Nguyen Anh Tran Dac; Hong Nhien Trinh; Thi Thanh Hai Nguyen; Bao Tinh Le Binh; Khanh Le; Minh Tien Nguyen; Quang Tung Thai; Thanh Vu Vo; Ngoc Quang Minh Ngo; Thi Kim Huyen Dang; Ngoc Huong Cao; Thu Van Tran; Lu Viet Ho; Jeremy Farrar; Menno de Jong; H Rogier van Doorn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric J McGrath; Ronald Thomas; Basim Asmar; Marilyn R Fairfax; Paul Lephart; Jamal Ameli; Nahed Abdel-Haq; Hossein Salimnia Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2013-03-17 Impact factor: 2.918