Literature DB >> 20711044

Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Asheesh Bedi1, Richard K N Ryu.   

Abstract

When stabilization surgery fails, both patient and treating physician face disappointment as well as additional stress in attempting to solve this difficult clinical challenge. The treating physician must: (1) review the basics of what constitutes stability, (2) confirm the correct diagnosis by performing a thorough examination supplemented by appropriate imaging, (3) determine the reason for failure, (4) determine the expectations and needs of the patient, and (5) decide which operative or nonoperative approach provides the best potential result for the patient. This review article will provide a basic review of the key principles in the evaluation and management of patients with recurrent instability after a failed arthroscopic anterior stabilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20711044     DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181ec8484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev        ISSN: 1062-8592            Impact factor:   1.985


  2 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Bankart repair: Have we finally reached a gold standard?

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo; Marco Conti; Brody Flanagin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Failed Primary Arthroscopic Stabilization With Subcritical Bone Loss.

Authors:  Emilio Calvo; Gonzalo Luengo; Diana Morcillo; Antonio M Foruria; María Valencia
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.