Yuhai Zhang1, Haixia Su2, Lei Shang1, Duan Li3, Rui Wang1, Ruiqiao Zhang4, Yongyong Xu1. 1. Department of Health Statistics (YZ, LS, RW, YX) Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China. 2. Department of Epidemiology (HS) Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China. 3. Tangdu Hospital (DL) Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China. 4. Sanatorium Center for Retired Cadre (RZ), Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to measure the preferences for and perceived involvement in treatment decision making among Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis and to explore the factors that may influence patients' preferences. The study also aimed to analyze patients' satisfaction with decision and information provision and their relationships with the decisional role. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were performed with 178 chronic hepatitis patients. The Control Preferences Scale was translated into Chinese from English and adopted to measure patients' preferred and perceived decisional role. Patients' satisfaction with decision and information provision was also investigated by a 5-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS: Patients with chronic hepatitis in the study generally preferred a collaborative role (45%) or passive role (44%); only 11% of patients preferred an active role in treatment decision making. The agreement between patients' perceived and preferred role was not perfect (Bowker's S = 33.8, P < 0.001). Age and education level were significantly associated with patients' preferences: Younger, better educated patients tended to prefer more active roles. A total of 54% of patients felt satisfied with treatment decisions, whereas 39% of patients felt satisfied with information provision. Patients' levels of satisfaction with their treatment decisions were correlated not only with the perceived role itself but also with its agreement with the preferred role. Patients' satisfaction with information provision was significantly correlated with patients' preferred role. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between patients' satisfaction with the treatment decision and information provision. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' preferences for participation in treatment decision making should be considered seriously by doctors during the encounter. Health providers should make a greater effort to improve doctor-patient communication and decrease the mismatch between patients' perceived and preferred decisional role.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to measure the preferences for and perceived involvement in treatment decision making among Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis and to explore the factors that may influence patients' preferences. The study also aimed to analyze patients' satisfaction with decision and information provision and their relationships with the decisional role. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were performed with 178 chronic hepatitispatients. The Control Preferences Scale was translated into Chinese from English and adopted to measure patients' preferred and perceived decisional role. Patients' satisfaction with decision and information provision was also investigated by a 5-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS:Patients with chronic hepatitis in the study generally preferred a collaborative role (45%) or passive role (44%); only 11% of patients preferred an active role in treatment decision making. The agreement between patients' perceived and preferred role was not perfect (Bowker's S = 33.8, P < 0.001). Age and education level were significantly associated with patients' preferences: Younger, better educated patients tended to prefer more active roles. A total of 54% of patients felt satisfied with treatment decisions, whereas 39% of patients felt satisfied with information provision. Patients' levels of satisfaction with their treatment decisions were correlated not only with the perceived role itself but also with its agreement with the preferred role. Patients' satisfaction with information provision was significantly correlated with patients' preferred role. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between patients' satisfaction with the treatment decision and information provision. CONCLUSIONS:Patients' preferences for participation in treatment decision making should be considered seriously by doctors during the encounter. Health providers should make a greater effort to improve doctor-patient communication and decrease the mismatch between patients' perceived and preferred decisional role.
Authors: Mareike Benecke; Jürgen Kasper; Christoph Heesen; Nina Schäffler; Daniel R Reissmann Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Linda Brom; Wendy Hopmans; H Roeline W Pasman; Danielle R M Timmermans; Guy A M Widdershoven; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Yew Kong Lee; Ping Yein Lee; Ai Theng Cheong; Chirk Jenn Ng; Khatijah Lim Abdullah; Teng Aik Ong; Azad Hassan Abdul Razack Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 3.240