Literature DB >> 20709937

How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants.

Thomas Kessler1, Jörg Neumann, Amélie Mummendey, Anne Berthold, Thomas Schubert, Sven Waldzus.   

Abstract

To explain the determinants of negative behavior toward deviants (e.g., punishment), this article examines how people evaluate others on the basis of two types of standards: minimal and maximal. Minimal standards focus on an absolute cutoff point for appropriate behavior; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies dichotomously between acceptable or unacceptable. Maximal standards focus on the degree of deviation from that standard; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies gradually from positive to less positive. This framework leads to the prediction that violation of minimal standards should elicit punishment regardless of the degree of deviation, whereas punishment in response to violations of maximal standards should depend on the degree of deviation. Four studies assessed or manipulated the type of standard and degree of deviation displayed by a target. Results consistently showed the expected interaction between type of standard (minimal and maximal) and degree of deviation on punishment behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20709937     DOI: 10.1177/0146167210380603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  2 in total

1.  The Role of Compensatory Beliefs in Rationalizing Environmentally Detrimental Behaviors.

Authors:  Aimie L B Hope; Christopher R Jones; Thomas L Webb; Matthew T Watson; Daphne Kaklamanou
Journal:  Environ Behav       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence.

Authors:  Jim A C Everett; Nadira S Faber; Julian Savulescu; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.