Literature DB >> 2070985

Endoscopic biopsy technique for acquiring larger mucosal samples.

D S Levine1, B J Reid.   

Abstract

Biopsies of the esophagus, stomach, and intestine are most often obtained using the traditional advance-and-close method with flexible endoscopes by extending an open forceps several millimeters beyond the endoscope tip to sample the mucosa, all under direct vision. We developed an alternative "turn-and-suction" endoscopic biopsy technique that permits the acquisition of larger mucosal samples. The biopsy forceps is advanced into the lumen, opened, and withdrawn backward until it is flush with the endoscope tip. Next, the endoscope tip is turned gently into the wall while air is suctioned from the lumen, and the biopsy forceps is very slightly advanced and then closed, usually without direct visualization. After straightening the endoscope tip, the biopsy is obtained by withdrawing the forceps and avulsing a superficial mucosal sample. By using this new method, we have safely taken over 10,000 biopsies without complications in endoscopic surveillance research protocols in patients at risk for gastrointestinal cancer. To compare the sizes of biopsies obtained with these two techniques, histologic sections of 341 mucosal samples from 12 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis were studied retrospectively. The mean greatest length of biopsy sections using the traditional technique was 4.72 mm, and using our new technique was 7.35 mm (56% longer). The turn-and-suction endoscopic biopsy method is best applied when flat mucosa is randomly sampled to seek microscopic pathologic changes that are not visible endoscopically, and may be advantageous for various non-histologic research analyses of gastrointestinal mucosa which are limited by tissue quantity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2070985     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70726-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  Serum selenium levels in relation to markers of neoplastic progression among persons with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Rebecca E Rudolph; Thomas L Vaughan; Alan R Kristal; Patricia L Blount; Douglas S Levine; Patricia C Galipeau; Laura J Prevo; Carissa A Sanchez; Peter S Rabinovitch; Brian J Reid
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Barrett's esophagus and the increasing role of endoluminal therapy.

Authors:  Michael S Smith; Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Randomized comparison of 3 different-sized biopsy forceps for quality of sampling in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Susana Gonzalez; Woojin M Yu; Michael S Smith; Kristen N Slack; Heidrun Rotterdam; Julian A Abrams; Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: definitions and diagnosis.

Authors:  E F Stange; S P L Travis; S Vermeire; C Beglinger; L Kupcinkas; K Geboes; A Barakauskiene; V Villanacci; A Von Herbay; B F Warren; C Gasche; H Tilg; Stefan W Schreiber; J Schölmerich; W Reinisch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Nonadenomatous dysplasia in barrett esophagus: a clinical, pathologic, and DNA content flow cytometric study.

Authors:  Rachel L Rucker-Schmidt; Carissa A Sanchez; Patricia L Blount; Kumran Ayub; Xiahong Li; Peter S Rabinovitch; Brian J Reid; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Eradication of Barrett's mucosa with argon plasma coagulation and acid suppression: immediate and mid term results.

Authors:  J L Van Laethem; M Cremer; M O Peny; M Delhaye; J Devière
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Majid A Al Madi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  Endoscopic-pathologic correlates of Candida esophagitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Authors:  C M Wilcox; D A Schwartz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Is lesion size an independent indication for endoscopic resection of biopsy-proven low-grade gastric dysplasia?

Authors:  Min Kyung Kim; Jae Young Jang; Jung-Wook Kim; Jae-Jun Shim; Chang Kyun Lee; Young Woon Chang; Bong Keun Choe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A novel biosimulator based on ex vivo porcine lungs for training in peripheral tissue sampling using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath.

Authors:  Tsukasa Ishiwata; Takahiro Nakajima; Jiro Terada; Koichiro Tatsumi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.