Literature DB >> 2070984

Limited benefit of atropine as premedication for colonoscopy.

I Waxman1, J Mathews, J Gallagher, J Kidwell, M J Collen, J H Lewis, E L Cattau, F H al-Kawas, D E Fleischer, S B Benjamin.   

Abstract

A prospective double-blind trial was performed comparing atropine (0.5 mg) by slow intravenous administration to placebo as premedication for colonoscopy, to assess the possible beneficial effects of this vagolytic agent on the performance and safety of the procedure. A total of 77 patients was randomly assigned to receive atropine (38 patients) or placebo (39 patients) before colonoscopy in conjunction with our standard initial medications for conscious sedation (meperidine, 0.4 mg/kg and midazolam, 0.03 mg/kg). Total procedure time was 31 min for the atropine group and 35 min for the placebo group (p greater than 0.05), and there was no overall difference in the total amount of intra-procedural medications required. No statistically significant differences were observed relative to the number or severity of vagal episodes, and neither the endoscopist nor the patients noted any differences in the ease or tolerance of the procedure (p greater than 0.05). Although these results fail to demonstrate a significant benefit of atropine when given routinely as premedication for colonoscopy, this study does not rule out the potential usefulness of atropine in counteracting vagal episodes when they occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2070984     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70725-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

Review 1.  Conscious sedation: pearls and perils.

Authors:  A Minocha; R Srinivasan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Hyoscine for polyp detection during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Imran Ashraf; Sohail Ashraf; Sameer Siddique; Douglas L Nguyen; Abhishek Choudhary; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-11-16

3.  Effect of Trospium Chloride on Duodenal Motility during Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  H Rohde; A M Bihr; U Schwantes; R Eisebitt; J Meurer; M Fischer; P Topfmeier
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Does hyoscine butylbromide really improve polyp detection during colonoscopy? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pei-Jing Cui; Jing Yao; Hua-Zhong Han; Yi-Jun Zhao; Jun Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Mechanisms of hyoscine butylbromide to improve adenoma detection: A case-control study of surface visualization at simulated colonoscope withdrawal.

Authors:  James E East; Brian P Saunders; David Burling; Emily Tam; Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-09-15

6.  Hyoscine butylbromide for colorectal polyp detection: prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Oliveira Dos Santos; Hamilton Moreira; Julio Carlos Pereira-Lima; Carmen Australia Paredes Marcondes Ribas; Fernanda de Quadros Onófrio; Alexandre Eduardo Augusti Czecko; Rafael Koerich Ramos; Caroline Aragão de Carvalho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Impact of Hyoscine Bromide Use on Polyp Detection Rate During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Yasir Khan; Ahmed Dirweesh; Waqas Javed Siddiqui
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2018-02-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.