STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in vaginal microbiota and pH over time among never sexually active adolescents at different menarcheal stages. DESIGN: A cohort of 49 sexually inexperienced Ugandan adolescents provided weekly self-collected vaginal swabs and behavioral/health information for up to two years. Menarcheal stage was classified as: not experiencing menarche during follow-up (premenarcheal, n = 9), achieving menarche during follow-up (perimenarcheal, n = 20), and being postmenarcheal (n = 20) at enrollment. Vaginal microbiota were characterized as morphotypes of large gram-positive rods, small gram-negative or variable rods, and curved gram-negative rods based on Nugent Gram-stain criteria. Baseline measures were compared using nonparametric tests. Mean changes (β) in morphotypes and pH over time were estimated using longitudinal mixed-effects models. RESULTS: The baseline median (IQR: interquartile range) Nugent score was 8 (7-8) in premenarcheal, 4.5 (1-8) in perimenarcheal, and 1 (0-3) in postmenarcheal girls (P = 0.001). For each respective menarcheal stage, the median (IQR) counts of gram-positive rods were 0 (0-0), 10 (0-30), and 30 (18-30) (P = 0.002) and gram-negative or variable rods were 30 (30-30), 16 (0.5-30), and 0.5 (0-2.5) (P = 0.002) at enrollment. Counts of gram-positive rods increased (β = 0.259, 95% CI: 0.156, 0.362) and gram-negative or variable rods decreased (β = -0.201, 95% CI:-0.298,-0.103) significantly over time in premenarcheal girls, but not in other groups. Vaginal pH declined significantly in peri- and postmenarcheal girls only. CONCLUSION: Vaginal microbiota composition varied by menarcheal stage at enrollment. Over time, significant changes in vaginal morphotypes occurred in premenarcheal girls, suggesting this may be an important period of transition. Copyright Â
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in vaginal microbiota and pH over time among never sexually active adolescents at different menarcheal stages. DESIGN: A cohort of 49 sexually inexperienced Ugandan adolescents provided weekly self-collected vaginal swabs and behavioral/health information for up to two years. Menarcheal stage was classified as: not experiencing menarche during follow-up (premenarcheal, n = 9), achieving menarche during follow-up (perimenarcheal, n = 20), and being postmenarcheal (n = 20) at enrollment. Vaginal microbiota were characterized as morphotypes of large gram-positive rods, small gram-negative or variable rods, and curved gram-negative rods based on Nugent Gram-stain criteria. Baseline measures were compared using nonparametric tests. Mean changes (β) in morphotypes and pH over time were estimated using longitudinal mixed-effects models. RESULTS: The baseline median (IQR: interquartile range) Nugent score was 8 (7-8) in premenarcheal, 4.5 (1-8) in perimenarcheal, and 1 (0-3) in postmenarcheal girls (P = 0.001). For each respective menarcheal stage, the median (IQR) counts of gram-positive rods were 0 (0-0), 10 (0-30), and 30 (18-30) (P = 0.002) and gram-negative or variable rods were 30 (30-30), 16 (0.5-30), and 0.5 (0-2.5) (P = 0.002) at enrollment. Counts of gram-positive rods increased (β = 0.259, 95% CI: 0.156, 0.362) and gram-negative or variable rods decreased (β = -0.201, 95% CI:-0.298,-0.103) significantly over time in premenarcheal girls, but not in other groups. Vaginal pH declined significantly in peri- and postmenarcheal girls only. CONCLUSION: Vaginal microbiota composition varied by menarcheal stage at enrollment. Over time, significant changes in vaginal morphotypes occurred in premenarcheal girls, suggesting this may be an important period of transition. Copyright Â
Authors: Thomas L Cherpes; Leslie A Meyn; Marijane A Krohn; Joel G Lurie; Sharon L Hillier Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Amalia S Meier; Peter G Waiyaki; Rosemary Nguti; Jane N Njeri; King K Holmes Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Paria Mirmonsef; Sharada Modur; Derick Burgad; Douglas Gilbert; Elizabeth T Golub; Audrey L French; Kerrie McCotter; Alan L Landay; Greg T Spear Journal: Menopause Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Daniel B DiGiulio; Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Elizabeth K Costello; Deirdre J Lyell; Anna Robaczewska; Christine L Sun; Daniela S A Goltsman; Ronald J Wong; Gary Shaw; David K Stevenson; Susan P Holmes; David A Relman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Roxana J Hickey; Xia Zhou; Matthew L Settles; Julie Erb; Kristin Malone; Melanie A Hansmann; Marcia L Shew; Barbara Van Der Pol; J Dennis Fortenberry; Larry J Forney Journal: MBio Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Paria Mirmonsef; Anna L Hotton; Douglas Gilbert; Derick Burgad; Alan Landay; Kathleen M Weber; Mardge Cohen; Jacques Ravel; Gregory T Spear Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bonnie Chaban; Matthew G Links; Teenus Paramel Jayaprakash; Emily C Wagner; Danielle K Bourque; Zoe Lohn; Arianne Yk Albert; Julie van Schalkwyk; Gregor Reid; Sean M Hemmingsen; Janet E Hill; Deborah M Money Journal: Microbiome Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 14.650