BACKGROUND: The substrate of myocardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) may involve the subepicardial myocardium. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of epicardial substrates in patients with a previously failed endocardial ablation attempt for VT as well as the safety and effectiveness of epicardial ablation. METHODS: Using an electroanatomic mapping system, endocardial and epicardial maps were acquired. Irrigated radiofrequency current ablations of all inducible VTs were performed. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2009, 59 patients with or without structural heart disease underwent epicardial VT ablation. Pericardial access failed in 3 (5%) of these patients. Of the remaining 56 patients, an epicardial substrate was found in 41 (73%). Overall, acute success was achieved in 46 (78%) of 59 patients, with complete VT abolition in 27 (46%) and partial abolition in 19 (32%). Successful outcomes were the result of endocardial ablation only in 14 (24%) patients, epicardial ablation in 21 (36%), and endocardial/epicardial in 11 (19%). Ablation failed to prevent reinduction in 8 (13%) patients, and VTs were noninducible prior to ablation in 5 (8%). Two periprocedural deaths occurred, one after right ventricular perforation and one due to electromechanical dissociation. Hepatic bleeding occurred in two patients. Recurrence of any VT occurred in 27 (47%) of 57 surviving patients during median follow-up of 362 days (q1-q3; 180-468 days). Repeat epicardial mapping was not feasible due to adhesions in 3 (25%) of 12 patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with a previously failed endocardial VT ablation, epicardial mapping reveals a VT substrate in nearly three fourths of all patients, and epicardial ablation is required for successful VT abolition in more than half of patients. However, life-threatening complications may occur. Repeat epicardial access was not possible in 25% due to local pericardial adhesions.
BACKGROUND: The substrate of myocardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) may involve the subepicardial myocardium. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of epicardial substrates in patients with a previously failed endocardial ablation attempt for VT as well as the safety and effectiveness of epicardial ablation. METHODS: Using an electroanatomic mapping system, endocardial and epicardial maps were acquired. Irrigated radiofrequency current ablations of all inducible VTs were performed. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2009, 59 patients with or without structural heart disease underwent epicardial VT ablation. Pericardial access failed in 3 (5%) of these patients. Of the remaining 56 patients, an epicardial substrate was found in 41 (73%). Overall, acute success was achieved in 46 (78%) of 59 patients, with complete VT abolition in 27 (46%) and partial abolition in 19 (32%). Successful outcomes were the result of endocardial ablation only in 14 (24%) patients, epicardial ablation in 21 (36%), and endocardial/epicardial in 11 (19%). Ablation failed to prevent reinduction in 8 (13%) patients, and VTs were noninducible prior to ablation in 5 (8%). Two periprocedural deaths occurred, one after right ventricular perforation and one due to electromechanical dissociation. Hepatic bleeding occurred in two patients. Recurrence of any VT occurred in 27 (47%) of 57 surviving patients during median follow-up of 362 days (q1-q3; 180-468 days). Repeat epicardial mapping was not feasible due to adhesions in 3 (25%) of 12 patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with a previously failed endocardial VT ablation, epicardial mapping reveals a VT substrate in nearly three fourths of all patients, and epicardial ablation is required for successful VT abolition in more than half of patients. However, life-threatening complications may occur. Repeat epicardial access was not possible in 25% due to local pericardial adhesions.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Emin Evren Ozcan; Gábor Széplaki; Tamás Tahin; István Osztheimer; Szabolcs Szilágyi; Béla Merkely; László Gellér Journal: Interv Med Appl Sci Date: 2013-12-20