Literature DB >> 20708841

The mini-open anterolateral approach for degenerative thoracolumbar disease.

Naresh P Patel1, Barry D Birch, Stacie E Dement, Gregg A Elbert.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anterolateral retroperitoneal, retrodiaphragmatic, and/or retropleural (RPDP) approaches have been used to treat a variety of spinal conditions. The traditional extensive thoracoabdominal approach can be modified to focus on the area of pathology. A less invasive "mini-open" anterolateral approach may be associated with fewer complications and shorter recovery than the thoracoabdominal procedure. There are few reports in the literature describing the technique and results of this less invasive approach to thoracolumbar degenerative pathology.
METHODS: 417 spinal fusion cases from a single institution were reviewed from 1999 to 2006, and 23 anterolateral mini-open approaches to degenerative spinal pathology were identified. The mini-open approach entailed a 4-8cm oblique lateral incision with harvesting of a single rib for use in arthrodesis, followed by RPDP access to the lateral spine. A total of 36 levels were fused. These cases were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum of two-year follow-up to determine the feasibility of the approach as well as incidence of complications. In addition, preliminary clinical results were tabulated.
RESULTS: One pseudarthrosis and four minor complications were identified. There were no major complications or deaths. Mean length of hospital stay was 4 days. Blood loss was less than 200cm(3) for all cases. Using modified Odom's criteria, 74% of patients had adequate resolution of their symptoms and rated their outcome as satisfactory, good, or excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: Mini-open anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine are associated with acceptable outcomes with a low complication rate. Although no direct comparison with the more extensive thoracoabdominal approach has been performed, review of the literature suggests that the mini-open approach reduces complications and length of hospital stay.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708841     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

Review 1.  Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2-L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Javier Quillo-Olvera; Guang-Xun Lin; Hyun-Jin Jo; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

2.  Prepsoas oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion in deformity surgery.

Authors:  Catherine Miller; Puneet Gulati; Deepak Bandlish; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

3.  Lateral-anterior lumbar interbody fusion (LaLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease: Technical notes, surgical system, and mid-term outcomes.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Cui; Jian-Ru Wang; Zhao-Min Zheng; Hui Liu; Hua Wang; Ze-Min Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Lumbar Spinal Fusion Using Lateral Oblique (Pre-psoas) Approach (Review).

Authors:  A Ya Aleinik; S G Mlyavykh; S Qureshi
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2021-10-29

Review 5.  Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Renjie Li; Xuefeng Li; Hong Zhou; Weimin Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 2.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.