Literature DB >> 20708255

Effect of specialist retrieval teams on outcomes in children admitted to paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales: a retrospective cohort study.

Padmanabhan Ramnarayan1, Krish Thiru, Roger C Parslow, David A Harrison, Elizabeth S Draper, Kathy M Rowan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive care services for children have undergone substantial centralisation in the UK. Along with the establishment of regional paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), specialist retrieval teams were set up to transport critically ill children from other hospitals. We studied the outcome of children transferred from local hospitals to PICUs.
METHODS: We analysed data that were gathered for a cohort of children (<or=16 years) admitted consecutively to 29 PICUs in England and Wales during 4 years (Jan 1, 2005, to Dec 31, 2008). We compared unplanned admissions from wards within the same hospital as the PICU and from other hospitals; interhospital transfers by non-specialist and specialist retrieval teams; and patients transferred to their nearest PICU and those who were not. Primary outcome measures were mortality rate in PICU and length of stay in PICU. We analysed data by use of logistic regression analysis.
FINDINGS: There were 57 997 admissions to PICUs during the study. Nearly half of unplanned admissions (17 649 [53%] of 33 492) were from other hospitals. Although children admitted from other hospitals were younger (median 10 months [IQR 1-55] vs 18 months [3-85]), sicker at admission (median predicted risk of mortality 6% [4-10] vs 4% [2-7]), stayed longer in PICUs (75 h [33-153] vs 43 h [18-116]), and had higher crude mortality rates (1384 [8%] of 17 649 vs 996 [6%] of 15 843; odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.38), the risk-adjusted mortality rate in PICUs was lower than among children admitted from within the same hospital (0.65, 0.53-0.80). In a multivariable analysis, use of a specialist retrieval team for transfer was associated with improved survival (0.58, 0.39-0.87).
INTERPRETATION: These findings support the policy of combining centralisation of intensive care services for children with transfer by specialist retrieval teams. FUNDING: National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme through Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, Health Commission Wales Specialised Services, National Health Service (NHS) Lothian and National Service Division NHS Scotland, the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, and the Pan Thames PICU Commissioning Consortium. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708255     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61113-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  29 in total

1.  Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Patrick Ferdinande
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  The intensive care medicine clinical research agenda in paediatrics.

Authors:  Mark J Peters; Andrew Argent; Marino Festa; Stéphane Leteurtre; Jefferson Piva; Ann Thompson; Douglas Willson; Pierre Tissières; Marisa Tucci; Jacques Lacroix
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Transport disposition using the Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics (TRAP) score.

Authors:  Sarah B Kandil; Heather A Schmenk Sanford; Veronika Northrup; Michael Theodore Bigham; John Sebastian Giuliano
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Is the volume of mechanically ventilated admissions to UK critical care units associated with improved outcomes?

Authors:  Jason Shahin; D A Harrison; K M Rowan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Mortality in Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Stefanie G Ames; Billie S Davis; Jennifer R Marin; Ericka L Fink; Lenora M Olson; Marianne Gausche-Hill; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Investigation of the status of interhospital transport of critically ill pediatric patients.

Authors:  Jun Qiu; Xiao-Li Wu; Zheng-Hui Xiao; Xian Hu; Xue-Li Quan; Yi-Min Zhu
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.764

7.  High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support in interhospital transport of critically ill children.

Authors:  Luregn J Schlapbach; Jonas Schaefer; Ann-Maree Brady; Sara Mayfield; Andreas Schibler
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Paediatric health care access in community health centres is associated with survival for critically ill children who undergo inter-facility transport: A province-wide observational study.

Authors:  Janice A Tijssen; Teresa To; Laurie J Morrison; Fuad Alnaji; Russell D MacDonald; Cynthia Cupido; Kyong-Soon Lee; Christopher S Parshuram
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  [Childhood emergencies-worsening healthcare bottlenecks for children in a systematic long-term analysis of the EMS system in a German metropolis].

Authors:  F Hoffmann; M Landeg; W Rittberg; D Hinzmann; D Steinbrunner; F Hey; F Heinen; K-G Kanz; V Bogner-Flatz
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  Hospital outcomes of children admitted to intensive care in British Columbia via interfacility transfer versus direct admission from 2015 to 2017: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Jollee S T Fung; Sean Wong; Srinivas Murthy; Fiona Muttalib
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.