Literature DB >> 20708205

[Dosimetric stereotactic radiosurgical accident: Study of 33 patients treated for brain metastases].

P-Y Borius1, B Debono, I Latorzeff, J-A Lotterie, J-Y Plas, E Cassol, P Bousquet, F Loubes, P Duthil, A Durand, F Caire, A Redon, I Berry, J Sabatier, Y Lazorthes.   

Abstract

The consequences of a dosimetric radiosurgery accident are not the same as a conventional radiotherapy accident. The objective of this study was to estimate the clinical and radiological outcome of patients treated by radiosurgery for metastasis during the period of the overexposure accident that occurred in the Toulouse Radiosurgery Unit. Between April 2006 and March 2007, 33 patients with 57 metastases were treated in the Toulouse Radiosurgery Unit (Novalis(®), BrainLab). An initial error in the estimation of the scatter factors led to an overexposure to radiation. The median age was 55 years [range, 35-85]. Twenty-one patients (64%) harbored a single metastasis. The primary tumor location was lung (16 cases), kidney (nine cases), breast (four cases), and others (four cases). The mean tumoral volume was 3.2cm(3) [0.04-14.07]. The mean prescribed dose at the isocenter was 20 Gy [range, 10-23], the mean delivered dose was 31.5 Gy [range, 13-52], and the mean overdose was 61.2% [range, 5.6-226.8]. In order to evaluate the consequences of the overdose, three parameters were analyzed: a risk index using dose and volume, the volume of parenchyma that received more than 12 Gy, and the mean dose in a sphere of 20cm(3) surrounding the target volume. Median actuarial survival was 14.1 months, the survival rate was 79.4 % at six months, 59.1% at 12 months, and 27.2% at 24 months. The rate of tumor control was 80.7%. No morbidity was observed. There was no correlation between death and the parameters studied. The survival rates and times observed in our study of the patients treated for brain metastases by radiosurgery and overexposed were among the good results of the international literature. Deaths were not related to the overdose and no side effect was noted. This dosimetric accident has not had worse consequences in this population.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708205     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2010.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochirurgie        ISSN: 0028-3770            Impact factor:   1.553


  4 in total

1.  Impact of the skull contour definition on Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ radiosurgery treatment planning.

Authors:  Henri-Arthur Leroy; Constantin Tuleasca; Michele Zeverino; Elodie Drumez; Nicolas Reyns; Marc Levivier
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Quality and safety in stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy: can more be done?

Authors:  Timothy D Solberg; Paul M Medin
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2011

3.  Quality and safety considerations in stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy: Executive summary.

Authors:  Timothy D Solberg; James M Balter; Stanley H Benedict; Benedick A Fraass; Brian Kavanagh; Curtis Miyamoto; Todd Pawlicki; Louis Potters; Yoshiya Yamada
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-15

4.  Common Error Pathways in CyberKnife™ Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Brandon T Mullins; Lukasz Mazur; Michael Dance; Ross McGurk; Eric Schreiber; Lawrence B Marks; Colette J Shen; Michael V Lawrence; Bhishamjit S Chera
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.