Literature DB >> 20707947

Developing a timeline for evaluating public health nutrition policy interventions. What are the outcomes and when should we expect to see them?

Jennie I Macdiarmid1, Jennifer Loe, Flora Douglas, Anne Ludbrook, Caroline Comerford, Geraldine McNeill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a timeline for evaluating public health nutrition policy interventions.
DESIGN: Concept mapping, a stakeholder-driven approach for developing an evaluation framework to estimate the 'time to impact' for policy interventions. The Schools (Health Promotion and Nutrition) (Scotland) Act 2007 was used as the model to develop the evaluation timeline as it had typical characteristics of government policy. Concept mapping requires stakeholders to generate a list of the potential outcomes, sort and rate the outcomes. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster data analysis were used to develop an anticipated timeline to impact for the policy.
SETTING: United Kingdom.
SUBJECTS: One hundred and eleven stakeholders representing nutrition, public health, medicine, education and catering in a range of sectors: research, policy, local government, National Health Service and schools.
RESULTS: Eighty-five possible outcomes were identified and grouped into thirteen clusters describing higher-level themes (e.g. long-term health, food literacy, economics, behaviour, diet, education). Negative and unintended consequences were anticipated relatively soon after implementation of the policy, whereas positive outcomes (e.g. dietary changes, health benefits) were thought likely to take longer to emerge. Stakeholders responsible for implementing the legislation anticipated that it would take longer to observe changes than those from policy or research.
CONCLUSIONS: Developing an anticipated timeline provides a realistic framework upon which to base an outcome evaluation for policy interventions and identifies positive and negative outcomes as well as considering possible unintended consequences. It offers benefit to both policy makers and researchers in mapping the progress expected towards long-term health goals and outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20707947     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010002168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  6 in total

1.  Towards quality criteria for regional public health reporting: concept mapping with Dutch experts.

Authors:  Marja J H van Bon-Martens; Peter W Achterberg; Ien A M van de Goor; Hans A M van Oers
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Developing and validating a scale to measure Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children in Iran.

Authors:  Aazam Doustmohammadian; Nasrin Omidvar; Nastaran Keshavarz-Mohammadi; Morteza Abdollahi; Maryam Amini; Hassan Eini-Zinab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A qualitative exploration of pharmacovigilance policy implementation in Jordan, Oman, and Kuwait using Matland's ambiguity-conflict model.

Authors:  Hamza Y Garashi; Douglas T Steinke; Ellen I Schafheutle
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.185

4.  Food and drink purchasing habits out of school at lunchtime: a national survey of secondary school pupils in Scotland.

Authors:  Jennie I Macdiarmid; Wendy J Wills; Lindsey F Masson; Leone C A Craig; Catherine Bromley; Geraldine McNeill
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Chronic disease prevention policy in British Columbia and Ontario in light of public health renewal: a comparative policy analysis.

Authors:  Anita Kothari; Dana Gore; Marjorie MacDonald; Gayle Bursey; Diane Allan; Jennifer Scarr
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Towards the Implementation of a Conceptual Framework of Food and Nutrition Literacy: Providing Healthy Eating for the Population.

Authors:  Virginia Vettori; Chiara Lorini; Chiara Milani; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.