Literature DB >> 20707795

A post-radical-prostatectomy nomogram incorporating new pathological variables and interaction terms for improved prognosis.

Beverley A O'Brien1, Ronald J Cohen, Thomas M Wheeler, Rachael E Moorin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate new variables in prostate pathology reporting including, the per cent of Gleason patterns 4 and/or 5 (% 4/5), presence or absence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP), tumour volume and the prostatic zone of tumour origin as predictors of post-radical-prostatectomy (RP) biochemical recurrence (BCR). To develop an optimal postoperative nomogram for patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study cohort was 1939 eligible patients from the Abbott West Australian Prostatectomy Database. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were developed to predict BCR which was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL. Our models and the 2009 Kattan postoperative nomogram were compared in terms of discrimination and calibration, with internal validation of our final model performed using bootstrapping methods. Our final model is presented as a nomogram.
RESULTS: The Kattan nomogram was accurate in discriminating our patients according to risk (concordance index: 0.791) but calibration analysis indicated underestimation of patient risk, particularly for high-risk disease. Our nomogram incorporates % 4/5, IDCP and prostate weight plus interaction terms between % 4/5, positive surgical margins and extracapsular extension, giving improved predictive accuracy (concordance index: 0.828) and calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms that predict risk of BCR defined as PSA ≥ 0.4 ng/mL may not be optimal for patient cohorts where BCR is defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL. If our findings are validated in other populations, current post-RP nomograms may be improved to a modest degree by incorporating the new variables prostate weight, IDCP and % 4/5, and by considering interactions between predictive variables.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20707795     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09539.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Do tumor volume, percent tumor volume predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Meng; He Li; Peng Xu; Jia Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Comedonecrosis Revisited: Strong Association With Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate.

Authors:  Samson W Fine; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Histopathology of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  The presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy is a significant prognostic factor for prostate cancer patients with distant metastasis at initial presentation.

Authors:  Masashi Kato; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Kyosuke Kimura; Akihiro Hirakawa; Fumie Kinoshita; Naoto Sassa; Ryo Ishida; Akitoshi Fukatsu; Tohru Kimura; Yasuhito Funahashi; Yoshihisa Matsukawa; Ryohei Hattori; Momokazu Gotoh
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Prognostic factors for the development of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed F Kotb; Ahmed A Elabbady
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 6.  Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate Gland: Recent Advances.

Authors:  Mukul K Divatia; Jae Y Ro
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Are preoperative Kattan and Stephenson nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy applicable in the Chinese population?

Authors:  Victor H W Yeung; Yi Chiu; Sylvia S Y Yu; W H Au; Steve W H Chan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-03-05

8.  Clinical significance of surgical margin status in patients subjected to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jakub Dobruch; Lukasz Nyk; Michał Skrzypczyk; Piotr Chłosta; Tomasz Dzik; Andrzej Borówka
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-12-11

9.  Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in prostate biopsy samples: correlation with aggressive pathological features after radical prostatectomy and prognostic value in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sha Zhu; Jin-Ge Zhao; Jun-Ru Chen; Zhen-Hua Liu; Guang-Xi Sun; Zhi-Peng Wang; Yu-Chao Ni; Jin-Dong Dai; Peng-Fei Shen; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Eszter Szentirmai; Giovanna Angela Giannico
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2020-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.