| Literature DB >> 20706796 |
Koji Wada1, Masaharu Hazawa, Kenji Takahashi, Takao Mori, Norio Kawahara, Ikuo Kashiwakura.
Abstract
The cytotoxicity of three alkaloids from the roots of Aconitum yesoense var. macroyesoense as well as 36 semi-synthetic C(20)-diterpenoid atisine-type alkaloid derivatives against A549 human lung carcinoma cells was examined. Ten acylated alkaloid derivatives, pseudokobusine 11-veratroate (9), 11-anisoate (12), 6,11-dianisoate (14), 11-p-nitrobenzoate (18), 11,15-di-p-nitrobenzoate (22), 11-cinnamate (25) and 11-m-trifluoromethylbenzoate (27), and kobusine 11-p-trifluoromethylbenzoate (35), 11-m-trifluoromethylbenzoate (36) and 11,15-di-p-nitrobenzoate (39), exhibited cytotoxic activity, and 11,15-dianisoylpseudokobusine (16) was found to be the most potent cytotoxic agent. Their IC(50) values against A549 cells ranged from 1.72 to 5.44 μM. In the occurrence of cytotoxic effects of atisine-type alkaloids, replacement by an acyl group at both C-11 and C-15 resulted in the enhancement of activity of the parent alkaloids compared to that from having hydroxy groups at this position, and the presence of a hydroxy group at the C-6 position was required for the cytotoxic effects. These acylated alkaloid derivatives inhibit cell growth through G1 arrest.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20706796 PMCID: PMC2999725 DOI: 10.1007/s11418-010-0452-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nat Med ISSN: 1340-3443 Impact factor: 2.343
Fig. 1Structure of C20-diterpenoid alkaloids and their derivatives
Cytotoxic effects of atisine-type C20-diterpenoid alkaloids against A549 cell lines
| Compound | 1 μg/mla | 5 μg/mla | IC50 (μM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.00 | 1.00 | – |
|
| 1.07 ± 0.16 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | ND |
|
| 1.12 ± 0.16 | 0.93 ± 0.04 | ND |
|
| 1.01 ± 0.03 | ND | ND |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.02 | ND | ND |
|
| 1.02 ± 0.01 | ND | ND |
|
| 0.88 ± 0.06* | ND | ND |
|
| 0.96 ± 0.06 | ND | ND |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.86 ± 0.03 | ND |
|
| 0.65 ± 0.06* | ND | 4.07 ± 0.00 |
|
| 0.94 ± 0.01 | ND | ND |
|
| 1.02 ± 0.01 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | ND |
|
| 0.65 ± 0.08* | ND | 2.20 ± 0.11 |
|
| 0.89 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.04* | ND |
|
| 0.66 ± 0.04* | 0.15 ± 0.04* | 3.68 ± 0.30 |
|
| 1.04 ± 0.14 | 0.25 ± 0.06* | ND |
|
| 0.54 ± 0.14* | 0.03 ± 0.01* | 1.72 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.03 | ND |
|
| 0.75 ± 0.08* | ND | 5.08 ± 0.15 |
|
| 0.93 ± 0.05 | 0.47 ± 0.04* | ND |
|
| 0.86 ± 0.11 | 0.11 ± 0.08* | ND |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.11 | 0.42 ± 0.10* | ND |
|
| 0.74 ± 0.14* | 0.03 ± 0.01* | 2.66 ± 0.21 |
|
| 1.05 ± 0.06 | 0.91 ± 0.05 | ND |
|
| 0.95 ± 0.04 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | ND |
|
| 0.59 ± 0.10* | ND | 4.24 ± 0.00 |
|
| 1.05 ± 0.06 | ND | ND |
|
| 0.69 ± 0.09* | ND | 4.67 ± 0.08 |
|
| 1.03 ± 0.05 | 1.17 ± 0.31 | ND |
|
| 1.09 ± 0.19 | 0.72 ± 0.07* | ND |
|
| 1.06 ± 0.19 | 0.64 ± 0.11* | ND |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.14 | 0.35 ± 0.04* | 11.42 ± 0.71 |
|
| 1.04 ± 0.25 | 0.50 ± 0.06* | ND |
|
| 1.09 ± 0.06 | 1.04 ± 0.05 | ND |
|
| 0.93 ± 0.19 | 0.44 ± 0.11* | ND |
|
| 0.72 ± 0.11* | 0.21 ± 0.04* | 5.44 ± 0.41 |
|
| 0.64 ± 0.06* | ND | 3.75 ± 0.14 |
|
| 0.91 ± 0.19 | 0.37 ± 0.10* | ND |
|
| 0.92 ± 0.23 | 0.89 ± 0.04* | ND |
|
| 0.75 ± 0.22 | 0.27 ± 0.24* | 3.02 ± 0.47 |
| Pemetrexed | 0.14 ± 0.05* | 0.13 ± 0.04* | 0.48 ± 0.07 |
ND not determined
aEach value is the mean ± SD of three determinations
* p < 0.05, indicating significant difference from the control value
Fig. 2The effects of compounds 14, 16 and 35 on the cell cycle distribution of A549 cells. A549 cells treated with vehicle (DMSO) alone and each compound at doses of its IC50 and double IC50 values for 24 h were fixed, and the cell cycle distribution was then analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative cytograms are shown
Fig. 3The effects of compounds 14, 16 and 35 on the G1 phase population of A549 cells. A549 cells following treatment with vehicle alone and each compound at doses of double IC50 values for 24 and 48 h