Literature DB >> 20706077

Assessment of comparative skills between hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colorectal training on an augmented reality simulator.

F Leblanc1, C P Delaney, P C Neary, J Rose, K M Augestad, A J Senagore, C N Ellis, B J Champagne.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare skills sets during a hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colectomy on an augmented reality simulator.
METHODS: Twenty-nine surgeons, assigned randomly in 2 groups, performed laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies on a simulator: group A (n = 15) performed hand-assisted then straight procedures; group B (n = 14) performed straight then hand-assisted procedures. Groups were compared according to prior laparoscopic colorectal experience, performance (time, instrument path length, and instrument velocity changes), technical skills, and operative error.
RESULTS: Prior laparoscopic colorectal experience was similar in both groups. Both groups had better performances with the hand-assisted approach, although technical skill scores were similar between approaches. The error rate was higher with the hand-assisted approach in group A, but similar between both approaches in group B.
CONCLUSIONS: These data define the metrics of performance for hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colectomy on an augmented reality simulator. The improved scores with the hand-assisted approach suggest that with this simulator a hand-assisted model may be technically easier to perform, although it is associated with increased intraoperative errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20706077     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e263f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

1.  Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on a training simulator: what is the difference? A stepwise comparison of hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performance on an augmented reality simulator.

Authors:  Fabien Leblanc; Conor P Delaney; Clyde N Ellis; Paul C Neary; Bradley J Champagne; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation.

Authors:  Shazrinizam Shaharan; Paul Neary
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

3.  Capability of a new paediatric oesophageal Doppler monitor to detect changes in cardiac output during testing of external pacemakers after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Thilo Fleck; Stephan Schubert; Brigitte Stiller; Matthias Redlin; Peter Ewert; Nicole Nagdyman; Felix Berger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Advanced training in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Beyer-Berjot; Vanessa Palter; Teodor Grantcharov; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Knowing the operative game plan: a novel tool for the assessment of surgical procedural knowledge.

Authors:  Jacques Balayla; Simon Bergman; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Liane S Feldman; Shannon A Fraser
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Augmented reality in healthcare education: an integrative review.

Authors:  Egui Zhu; Arash Hadadgar; Italo Masiello; Nabil Zary
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.