Literature DB >> 20705978

Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: the need for sanitary reform.

Jay P Graham1, Keeve E Nachman.   

Abstract

Confined food-animal operations in the United States produce more than 40 times the amount of waste than human biosolids generated from US wastewater treatment plants. Unlike biosolids, which must meet regulatory standards for pathogen levels, vector attraction reduction and metal content, no treatment is required of waste from animal agriculture. This omission is of concern based on dramatic changes in livestock production over the past 50 years, which have resulted in large increases in animal waste and a high degree of geographic concentration of waste associated with the regional growth of industrial food-animal production. Regulatory measures have not kept pace with these changes. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) review trends that affect food-animal waste production in the United States, 2) assess risks associated with food-animal wastes, 3) contrast food-animal waste management practices to management practices for biosolids and 4) make recommendations based on existing and potential policy options to improve management of food-animal waste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20705978     DOI: 10.2166/wh.2010.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Water Health        ISSN: 1477-8920            Impact factor:   1.744


  13 in total

Review 1.  Industrial Food Animal Production and Community Health.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Brent F Kim; Jesper Larsen; Lance B Price; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Veterinary pharmaceuticals in aqueous systems and associated effects: an update.

Authors:  Samuel Obimakinde; Olalekan Fatoki; Beatrice Opeolu; Olatunde Olatunji
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  "Ag-Gag" Laws: Evolution, Resurgence, and Public Health Implications.

Authors:  Caitlin A Ceryes; Christopher D Heaney
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2018-11-19

4.  Evaluating biological plausibility in supporting evidence for action through systematic reviews in public health.

Authors:  J Dailey; L Rosman; E K Silbergeld
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Availability of information about airborne hazardous releases from animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Tyler J S Smith; Leonard S Rubenstein; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Learning from agriculture: understanding low-dose antimicrobials as drivers of resistome expansion.

Authors:  Yaqi You; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Applying an environmental public health lens to the industrialization of food animal production in ten low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Yukyan Lam; Jillian P Fry; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.185

8.  Investigating the role of state and local health departments in addressing public health concerns related to industrial food animal production sites.

Authors:  Jillian P Fry; Linnea I Laestadius; Clare Grechis; Keeve E Nachman; Roni A Neff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey.

Authors:  Dina Fine Maron; Tyler J S Smith; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 10.  Pathogens transmitted in animal feces in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Miranda J Delahoy; Breanna Wodnik; Lydia McAliley; Gauthami Penakalapati; Jenna Swarthout; Matthew C Freeman; Karen Levy
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.