Literature DB >> 20705684

Using cluster analysis to interpret the variability of gross motor scores of children with typical development.

Karin Eldred1, Johanna Darrah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal research on gross motor percentile rank scores of children with typical development has documented intra-individual variability of scoring patterns. Clinically, interpreting these fluctuations presents a challenge for therapists.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of cluster analysis as a technique to organize the gross motor scoring patterns of children with typical development into clinically relevant groups.
DESIGN: This was a descriptive, exploratory study using data from 2 longitudinal studies. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-six children with typical development participated in the study.
METHODS: The children were assessed on the gross motor subscale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales at 9, 11, 13, 16, and 21 months of age and on the gross motor subscale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, 2nd edition, at 4, 4.5, 5, and 5.5 years of age. Demographic and health data were collected. Parents were interviewed when the children were 8 years of age. Cluster analysis was conducted. Demographic and health data were compared across clusters.
RESULTS: Four distinct and clinically relevant clusters were identified. A significant difference was found among the clusters for total number of illnesses. LIMITATIONS: The children in these analyses were at low risk for gross motor problems. Further research with a more high-risk sample is needed to validate the clinical utility of the identified clusters.
CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis techniques may offer a mechanism to explore longitudinal data in physical therapy research. The techniques provided a mechanism to group data without losing the richness of information provided by the intra-individual variability of scoring patterns. Clinically, examination of distinct scoring patterns may lead to improved accuracy in screening for gross motor concerns compared with the traditional use of single-assessment cutoff points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20705684     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  3 in total

1.  Time trends and determinants of multiple development delays in Bavarian preschool children: a retrospective analysis from 1997 to 2010.

Authors:  Heribert Ludwig Stich; Riccardo Caniato; Alexander Krämer; Bernhard Baune
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Clustering of developmental delays in Bavarian preschool children - a repeated cross-sectional survey over a period of 12 years.

Authors:  Heribert L Stich; Alexander Krämer; Rafael T Mikolajczyk
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 3.  Identifying important life stages for monitoring and assessing risks from exposures to environmental contaminants: results of a World Health Organization review.

Authors:  Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Thea de Wet; Lilo Du Toit; Michael P Firestone; Mathuros Ruchirawat; Jacqueline van Engelen; Carolyn Vickers
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.271

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.