Literature DB >> 20705558

Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid plus endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer.

Thomas E Delea1, Charu Taneja, Oleg Sofrygin, Satyin Kaura, Michael Gnant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adding zoledronic acid 4 mg intravenously every 6 months to endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer from a US health care system perspective.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to predict disease progression, mortality, and costs of breast cancer care for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer receiving up to 3 years of (1) endocrine therapy (goserelin plus tamoxifen or anastrozole); or (2) endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid. Model parameters were obtained from ABCSG-12 (Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial-12) and the literature. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with zoledronic acid was calculated under 2 scenarios: (1) benefits of zoledronic acid persist to maximum (7 years) follow-up in ABCSG-12 ("trial benefits") or (2) benefits persist until death ("lifetime benefits").
RESULTS: Adding zoledronic acid to endocrine therapy was projected to yield a gain of 0.41 life years (LYs) and 0.43 QALYs assuming trial benefits and 1.34 LYs and 1.41 QALYs assuming lifetime benefits. Assuming trial benefits, the incremental cost per QALY gained with zoledronic acid was $9300. Assuming lifetime benefits, zoledronic acid was estimated to increase QALYs and reduce costs. Cost per QALY gained was <or= $56,000 in all deterministic sensitivity analyses and was <or= $50,000 in 94% and 97% of probabilistic sensitivity analyses for trial and lifetime benefits scenarios, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Adding zoledronic acid to endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer is cost-effective from a US health care system perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20705558     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2010.n.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing drug outcomes through pharmacogenetics: a case for preemptive genotyping.

Authors:  J S Schildcrout; J C Denny; E Bowton; W Gregg; J M Pulley; M A Basford; J D Cowan; H Xu; A H Ramirez; D C Crawford; M D Ritchie; J F Peterson; D R Masys; R A Wilke; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Evaluating the evidence for targeting FOXO3a in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Taylor; Matthew Lam; Chathyan Pararasa; James Ep Brown; Amtul R Carmichael; Helen R Griffiths
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 3.  Unremarked or Unperformed? Systematic Review on Reporting of Validation Efforts of Health Economic Decision Models in Seasonal Influenza and Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Pieter T de Boer; Geert W J Frederix; Talitha L Feenstra; Pepijn Vemer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Incidence, risk factors and prognostic characteristics of bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs) in breast cancer patients: A systematic review of the real world data.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhang; Wei Zhu; Ewelina Biskup; Weige Yang; Ziang Yang; Hong Wang; Xiaochun Qiu; Chengjiao Zhang; Guangxia Hu; Guangfu Hu
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.072

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.