Literature DB >> 20705152

Clinician satisfaction and insertion characteristics of a new applicator to insert radiopaque Implanon: an open-label, noncontrolled, multicenter trial.

Diana Mansour1, Ellen Mommers, Helena Teede, Bjarne Sollie-Eriksen, Oliver Graesslin, Hans-Joachim Ahrendt, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The etonogestrel (ENG) implant Implanon is a progestin-only contraceptive that provides effective contraception for up to 3 years. A new radiopaque ENG implant has been developed to extend the diagnostic modalities of Implanon and a next-generation applicator (NGA) was designed to facilitate correct subdermal insertion of Implanon. STUDY
DESIGN: In this open-label study, 23 investigators, experienced and inexperienced with Implanon, performed 301 insertions of the new radiopaque implant using the NGA. Primary outcome measurements were obtained from clinician satisfaction questionnaires completed after the 4th, 8th and 12th insertions. Additionally, insertion characteristics and X-ray visibility were assessed.
RESULTS: Almost all investigators were satisfied with the NGA from the first insertion onward, and all were satisfied or very satisfied after 12 insertions. The most frequently reported advantages included ease of use, one-handed action and fast insertion time; 2% of insertions were considered difficult in skin puncturing and/or sliding the needle subdermally. Three incorrect insertions occurred due to noncompliance with instructions. All assessed implants were visible on plain X-ray imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: The NGA was well accepted by investigators with or without prior experience with Implanon. The results stressed the importance of correctly following implant insertion instructions. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20705152     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  4 in total

1.  Bioequivalence and x-ray visibility of a radiopaque etonogestrel implant versus a non-radiopaque implant: a 3-year, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Peter Schnabel; Gabriele S Merki-Feld; Alice Malvy; Ingrid Duijkers; Ellen Mommers; Michiel W van den Heuvel
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Recent advances in contraception.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; James Trussell
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

3.  Experiences of localization and removal of non-palpable subdermal contraceptive implants with ultrasound.

Authors:  SooHyun Kim; Young Sik Choi; Jeong Sook Kim; Sungjun Kim; SiHyun Cho
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-04-17

Review 4.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.