Literature DB >> 20704632

Surgical specialization and training - its relation to clinical outcome for colorectal cancer surgery.

Suhail Anwar1, Sheila Fraser, Jim Hill.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Surgical sub-specialization has been considered to be a major factor in improving cancer surgery-related outcomes in terms of 5-year survival and disease-free intervals. In this article we have looked at the evidence supporting the improvement in colorectal cancer outcomes with 'colorectal specialists' performing colon and rectal surgery.
METHODS: A literature review was carried out using search engines such as Pubmed, Ovid and Cochrane Databases. Only studies looking at colorectal cancer outcome related to surgery were included in our review.
RESULTS: Specialist surgeons performing a high volume of colorectal cancer surgery demonstrated better 5-year survival rates in patients, with less local recurrence. This was most evident in surgery for rectal cancer, where an association with increased sphincter saving surgery was also seen. Total mesorectal excision is now the accepted treatment for rectal cancer and has markedly improved survival rates and decreased local recurrence.
CONCLUSION: The outcomes in colorectal surgery continue to steadily improve. The training of specialized colorectal surgeons is a major contributing factor towards this improvement.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20704632     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01525.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  5 in total

1.  Stenting for colorectal cancer obstruction compared to surgery--a study of consecutive patients in a single institution.

Authors:  Eva Angenete; Dan Asplund; Maria Bergström; Per-Ola Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Correlation between County-Level Surgeon Density and Mortality from Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jasem Albarrak; Aryan Firouzbakht; Renata D Peixoto; Maria Y Ho; Winson Y Cheung
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-12

3.  Report from the OECI Oncology Days 2014.

Authors:  Wh van Harten; G Stanta; G Bussolati; P Riegman; G Hoefler; Kf Becker; G Folprecht; M Truini; J Haybaeck; R Buiga; M Dono; A Bagg; Ja López Guerrero; S Zupo; F Lemare; F de Lorenzo; N Goedbloed; D Razavi; J Lövey; Pa Cadariu; Ga Rollandi; F Paparo; M Pierotti; T Ciuleanu; P De Paoli; G Weiner; M Saghatchian; Claudio Lombardo
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-12-31

4.  Hospital and Surgeon Selection for Medicare Beneficiaries With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer: The Role of Rurality, Distance to Care, and Colonoscopy Provider.

Authors:  Catherine Chioreso; Xiang Gao; Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp; Chi Lin; Marcia M Ward; Mary C Schroeder; Charles F Lynch; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Mary E Charlton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.787

5.  Resection probability maps for quality assessment of glioma surgery without brain location bias.

Authors:  Philip C De Witt Hamer; Eef J Hendriks; Emmanuel Mandonnet; Frederik Barkhof; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Hugues Duffau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.