Literature DB >> 20703723

Impact of computerized order entry and pre-mixed dialysis solutions for continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration on selection of therapy for acute renal failure.

Lawand Saadulla1, W Brian Reeves, Brittany Irey, Nasrollah Ghahramani.   

Abstract

To investigate the impacts of availability of pre-mixed solutions and computerized order entry on nephrologists' choice of the initial mode of renal replacement therapy in acute renal failure. We studied 898 patients with acute renal failure in 3 consecutive eras: era 1 (custom-mixed solution; n = 309), era 2 (pre-mixed commercial solution; n = 324), and era 3 (post-computerized order entry; n = 265). The proportion of patients treated with renal replacement therapy and the time from consult to initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy was similar in the 3 eras. Following introduction of the pre-mixed solution, the proportion of patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy increased (20% vs. 33%; p < 0.05), it was initiated at a lower serum creatinine (353 ± 123 μmol/L vs. 300 ± 80 μmol/L; p < 0.05) and in older patients (53 ± 12 vs. 61 ± 14 years; p < 0.05). There was a progressive increase in the use of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (18% vs. 79% vs. 100%; p < 0.05) and in the total prescribed flow rate (1,382 ± 546 vs. 2,324 ± 737 vs. 2,900 ± 305 mL/hr 3; p < 0.05). There was no significant impact on mortality. The availability of a pre-mixed solution increases the likelihood of initiating continuous renal replacement therapy in acute renal failure, initiating it at a lower creatinine and for older patients, use of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis and higher prescribed continuous renal replacement therapy dose. Computerized order entry implementation is associated with an additional increase in the use of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis, higher total prescribed dialysis dose, and use of CRRT among an increasing number of patients not on mechanical ventilation. The effect of these changes on patient survival is not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20703723     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9471-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  23 in total

1.  Daily hemodialysis and the outcome of acute renal failure.

Authors:  Helmut Schiffl; Susanne M Lang; Rainald Fischer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit compared with that seen in other settings. The Madrid Acute Renal Failure Study Group.

Authors:  F Liaño; E Junco; J Pascual; R Madero; E Verde
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.545

3.  Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report.

Authors:  A K Jha; G J Kuperman; J M Teich; L Leape; B Shea; E Rittenberg; E Burdick; D L Seger; M Vander Vliet; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  High clearance continuous renal replacement therapy with a modified dialysis machine.

Authors:  C Schlaeper; R Amerling; M Manns; N W Levin
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.545

5.  Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  C Ronco; R Bellomo; P Homel; A Brendolan; M Dan; P Piccinni; G La Greca
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Acute dialytic support for the critically ill: intermittent hemodialysis versus continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  E van Bommel; N D Bouvy; K L So; R Zietse; H H Vincent; H A Bruining; W Weimar
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 7.  Continuous renal replacement therapies: an update.

Authors:  M Manns; M H Sigler; B P Teehan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 8.  Treatment of acute renal failure.

Authors:  R A Star
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Prognostic stratification in critically ill patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis.

Authors:  G M Chertow; C L Christiansen; P D Cleary; C Munro; J M Lazarus
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-07-24

10.  Acute renal failure in intensive care units--causes, outcome, and prognostic factors of hospital mortality; a prospective, multicenter study. French Study Group on Acute Renal Failure.

Authors:  F G Brivet; D J Kleinknecht; P Loirat; P J Landais
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.