PURPOSE: Early definitive stabilisation is usually the treatment of choice for major fractures in polytrauma patients. Modifications may be made when patients are in critical condition, or when associated injuries dictate the timing of surgery. The current study investigates whether the timing of fracture treatment is different in different trauma systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients treated a Level I trauma centre were documented (Group US) and a matched-pair group was gathered from the German Trauma Registry (Group GTR). INCLUSION CRITERIA: New Injury Severity Score (NISS)>16, >2 major fractures and >1 organ/soft tissue injury. The timing and type of surgery for major fractures was recorded, as were major complications. RESULTS: 114 patients were included, n=57 Group US (35.1% F, 64.9% M, mean age: 44.1 yrs±16.49, mean NISS: 27.4±8.65, mean ICU stay: 10±7.49) and n=57 Group GTR (36.8% F, 63.1% M, mean age: 41.2 yrs±15.35, mean NISS: 29.4±6.88, mean ICU stay: 15.6±18.25). 44 (57.1%) out of 77 fractures in Group US received primary definitive fracture fixation compared to 61 (65.5%) out of 93 fractures in Group GTR (n.s.). The average duration until definitive treatment was comparable in all major extremity fractures (pelvis: 5 days±2.8 Group US, 7.1 days±9.6 Group GTR (n.s.), femur: 7.9 days±8.3 Group US, 5.5 days±7.9 (n.s.), tibia: 6.2 days±5.6 Group US, 6.2 days±9.1 Group GTR (n.s.), humerus: 5 days±3.7 Group US, 6.6 days±6.1 Group GTR (n.s.), radius: 6 days±4.7 Group US, 6.1 days±8.7 Group GTR (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The current matched-pair analysis demonstrates that the timing of initial definitive fixation of major fractures is comparable between the US and Europe. Certain fractures are stabilised internally in a staged fashion regardless the trauma system, thus discounting previous apparent contradictions.
PURPOSE: Early definitive stabilisation is usually the treatment of choice for major fractures in polytraumapatients. Modifications may be made when patients are in critical condition, or when associated injuries dictate the timing of surgery. The current study investigates whether the timing of fracture treatment is different in different trauma systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients treated a Level I trauma centre were documented (Group US) and a matched-pair group was gathered from the German Trauma Registry (Group GTR). INCLUSION CRITERIA: New Injury Severity Score (NISS)>16, >2 major fractures and >1 organ/soft tissue injury. The timing and type of surgery for major fractures was recorded, as were major complications. RESULTS: 114 patients were included, n=57 Group US (35.1% F, 64.9% M, mean age: 44.1 yrs±16.49, mean NISS: 27.4±8.65, mean ICU stay: 10±7.49) and n=57 Group GTR (36.8% F, 63.1% M, mean age: 41.2 yrs±15.35, mean NISS: 29.4±6.88, mean ICU stay: 15.6±18.25). 44 (57.1%) out of 77 fractures in Group US received primary definitive fracture fixation compared to 61 (65.5%) out of 93 fractures in Group GTR (n.s.). The average duration until definitive treatment was comparable in all major extremity fractures (pelvis: 5 days±2.8 Group US, 7.1 days±9.6 Group GTR (n.s.), femur: 7.9 days±8.3 Group US, 5.5 days±7.9 (n.s.), tibia: 6.2 days±5.6 Group US, 6.2 days±9.1 Group GTR (n.s.), humerus: 5 days±3.7 Group US, 6.6 days±6.1 Group GTR (n.s.), radius: 6 days±4.7 Group US, 6.1 days±8.7 Group GTR (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The current matched-pair analysis demonstrates that the timing of initial definitive fixation of major fractures is comparable between the US and Europe. Certain fractures are stabilised internally in a staged fashion regardless the trauma system, thus discounting previous apparent contradictions.
Authors: R M Sellei; P Kobbe; T Dienstknecht; P Lichte; R Pfeifer; M Behrens; S Brianza; H-C Pape Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Federico Coccolini; Philip F Stahel; Giulia Montori; Walter Biffl; Tal M Horer; Fausto Catena; Yoram Kluger; Ernest E Moore; Andrew B Peitzman; Rao Ivatury; Raul Coimbra; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Bruno Pereira; Sandro Rizoli; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Ari Leppaniemi; Roberto Manfredi; Stefano Magnone; Osvaldo Chiara; Leonardo Solaini; Marco Ceresoli; Niccolò Allievi; Catherine Arvieux; George Velmahos; Zsolt Balogh; Noel Naidoo; Dieter Weber; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Massimo Sartelli; Luca Ansaloni Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Markus Burkhardt; Ulrike Nienaber; Joerg H Holstein; Ulf Culemann; Bertil Bouillon; Emin Aghayev; Thomas Paffrath; Marc Maegele; Tim Pohlemann; Rolf Lefering Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 4.615