Literature DB >> 20701862

Reclassifying bioterrorism risk: are we preparing for the proper pathogens?

Georgios Pappas1, Paraskevi Panagopoulou, Nikolaos Akritidis.   

Abstract

Existing classifications of potential biological weapons, acknowledge only limited important parameters of biological weapon potential. Certain pathogen factors would further influence the outcome of a potential attack in context with social and political aspects of the time and space of the attack. The importance of these factors was investigated through various attack scenarios that have been developed by the authors, and an individual score for each of these factors was calculated, based on the overall effect their variation had in the scenario outcome. A new classification score for potential biological weapons was subsequently developed, one, which drastically alters the perception of risk for certain pathogens, such as filoviruses and anthrax. This frame further allows for more accurate evaluation of the bioweapon potential of agents such as avian flu. Recognition of intervening factors and proper assessment of the actual risk might augment in proper distribution of interest and funds on relevant medical research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20701862     DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2009.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Public Health        ISSN: 1876-0341            Impact factor:   3.718


  7 in total

1.  Identification of Highly Pathogenic Microorganisms by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry: Results of an Interlaboratory Ring Trial.

Authors:  Peter Lasch; Tara Wahab; Sandra Weil; Bernadett Pályi; Herbert Tomaso; Sabine Zange; Beathe Kiland Granerud; Michal Drevinek; Branko Kokotovic; Matthias Wittwer; Valentin Pflüger; Antonino Di Caro; Maren Stämmler; Roland Grunow; Daniela Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid and high-throughput detection of highly pathogenic bacteria by Ibis PLEX-ID technology.

Authors:  Daniela Jacob; Uschi Sauer; Roberta Housley; Cicely Washington; Kristin Sannes-Lowery; David J Ecker; Rangarajan Sampath; Roland Grunow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Biodefence research two decades on: worth the investment?

Authors:  Carrie M Long; Andrea Marzi
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 71.421

Review 4.  The current state of bioterrorist attack surveillance and preparedness in the US.

Authors:  Oliver Grundmann
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-10-09

Review 5.  Benefits of a European project on diagnostics of highly pathogenic agents and assessment of potential "dual use" issues.

Authors:  Roland Grunow; G Ippolito; D Jacob; U Sauer; A Rohleder; A Di Caro; R Iacovino
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-11-11

Review 6.  Integrating evolutionary aspects into dual-use discussion: the cases of influenza virus and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Noble Selasi Gati; Ozan Altan Altinok; Sriram Kumar; Verónica A Ferrando; Joachim Kurtz; Michael Quante; Stephan Ludwig; Alexander Mellmann
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 7.  Survey of systems for comparative ranking of agents that pose a bioterroristic threat.

Authors:  A Menrath; K Tomuzia; H Frentzel; J Braeunig; B Appel
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.702

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.