Literature DB >> 20701422

Peer support among inpatients in an adult mental health setting.

Lindsay Bouchard1, Marjorie Montreuil, Catherine Gros.   

Abstract

Existing literature indicates peer support is beneficial for people with mental illnesses and plays an important role in recovery. While many studies in the mental health field have focused on formalized peer support within the community, none have explored the experience of peer support among hospitalized patients. The purpose of the current study was to explore the perceptions and experiences of naturally occurring peer support among adult mental health inpatients. In-depth interviews were conducted with ten inpatients across four mental health units, two acute and two long-term. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive design. The data show that peer support among inpatients is extensive and beneficial, and occurs independently of staff involvement. The findings illustrate that peer support is a thoughtful process that involves observing, reflecting, taking action, and evaluating outcomes. Supportive actions include helping with activities of daily living, sharing material goods, providing information and advice, sharing a social life, and offering emotional support. This leads to various positive outcomes for providers and recipients of peer support, such as improved mental health outcomes and quality of life. Attempts to provide supportive interactions occur within a particular context, which can hinder or facilitate peer support. The new insights from this study could provide health professionals with an increased recognition of peer support and an appreciation for the unique role patients play in their own and in their peers' recovery. These findings have important implications for establishing collaborative working partnerships with mental health inpatients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20701422     DOI: 10.3109/01612841003793049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 0161-2840            Impact factor:   1.835


  6 in total

1.  Greater than the sum of the parts: a qualitative content analysis of what constitutes a good treatment in the inpatient setting.

Authors:  Cosima Locher; Sarah Buergler; Nadja Heimgartner; Helen Koechlin; Heike Gerger; Jens Gaab; Stefan Büchi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Identifying effective characteristics of behavioral weight management interventions for people with serious mental illness: A systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Lee; Carmen Piernas; Cristina Stewart; Moscho Michalopoulou; Anisa Hajzadeh; Rhiannon Edwards; Paul Aveyard; Felicity Waite
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 10.867

Review 3.  Peer Support Workers in Health: A Qualitative Metasynthesis of Their Experiences.

Authors:  Jennifer MacLellan; Julian Surey; Ibrahim Abubakar; Helen R Stagg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of Peer-Based Needle Exchange Programs on Mental Health Status in People Who Inject Drugs: A Nationwide New Zealand Study.

Authors:  Bianca Hay; Charles Henderson; John Maltby; Juan J Canales
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  A qualitative comparison of experiences of specialist mother and baby units versus general psychiatric wards.

Authors:  Jessica Griffiths; Billie Lever Taylor; Nicola Morant; Debra Bick; Louise M Howard; Gertrude Seneviratne; Sonia Johnson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  From peer-based to peer-led: redefining the role of peers across the hepatitis C care pathway: HepCare Europe.

Authors:  Julian Surey; Dee Menezes; Marie Francis; John Gibbons; Binta Sultan; Ala Miah; Ibrahim Abubakar; Alistair Story
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.