BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over the preferred technique of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCA). The goal of this retrospective study was to identify the preferred technique of PBD for HCA. METHODS: A total of 128 consecutive patients with HCA diagnosed between September 1999 and December 2009 who underwent PBD were included in this study. The study compared outcomes of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD), endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS), and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with HCA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative laboratory data, rates of major hepatectomy, or decompression periods among the 3 groups. Complications were significantly more frequent in the EBS group compared with either the ENBD or PTBD group (p < 0.05). Drainage tube occlusion with cholangitis was significantly more common in the EBS group compared with either the ENBD or PTBD group (p < 0.0001). Patients in the PTBD group experienced serious complications including vascular injury (8%) and cancer dissemination (4%). Patients in the ENBD and EBS groups had mild post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (5%). Conversion procedures were significantly more common in the EBS group compared with the ENBD and PTBD groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postsurgical morbidity or mortality among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Drainage tube occlusion with cholangitis was a frequent complication associated with EBS. PTBD was associated with serious complications such as vascular injury and cancer dissemination. ENBD was found to be the most suitable method for initial PBD management in patients with HCA.
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over the preferred technique of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCA). The goal of this retrospective study was to identify the preferred technique of PBD for HCA. METHODS: A total of 128 consecutive patients with HCA diagnosed between September 1999 and December 2009 who underwent PBD were included in this study. The study compared outcomes of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD), endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS), and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with HCA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative laboratory data, rates of major hepatectomy, or decompression periods among the 3 groups. Complications were significantly more frequent in the EBS group compared with either the ENBD or PTBD group (p < 0.05). Drainage tube occlusion with cholangitis was significantly more common in the EBS group compared with either the ENBD or PTBD group (p < 0.0001). Patients in the PTBD group experienced serious complications including vascular injury (8%) and cancer dissemination (4%). Patients in the ENBD and EBS groups had mild post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (5%). Conversion procedures were significantly more common in the EBS group compared with the ENBD and PTBD groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postsurgical morbidity or mortality among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS:Drainage tube occlusion with cholangitis was a frequent complication associated with EBS. PTBD was associated with serious complications such as vascular injury and cancer dissemination. ENBD was found to be the most suitable method for initial PBD management in patients with HCA.
Authors: H Kawakami; M Kuwatani; K Etoh; S Haba; H Yamato; K Shinada; Y Nakanishi; E Tanaka; S Hirano; S Kondo; K Kubota; M Asaka Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Jaap J Kloek; Niels A van der Gaag; Yalda Aziz; Erik A J Rauws; Otto M van Delden; Johan S Lameris; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Alessandro Rizzo; Angela Dalia Ricci; Giorgio Frega; Andrea Palloni; Stefania DE Lorenzo; Francesca Abbati; Veronica Mollica; Simona Tavolari; Mariacristina DI Marco; Giovanni Brandi Journal: In Vivo Date: 2020 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: John C Mansour; Thomas A Aloia; Christopher H Crane; Julie K Heimbach; Masato Nagino; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Jimme K Wiggers; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Robert J Coelen; Erik A Rauws; Mark A Schattner; C Yung Nio; Karen T Brown; Mithat Gonen; Susan van Dieren; Krijn P van Lienden; Peter J Allen; Marc G H Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Michael I D'Angelica; Robert P DeMatteo; Dirk J Gouma; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 10.093