Literature DB >> 2070054

Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): comparison with Ph+ CML and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. The Groupe Français de Cytogénétique Hématologique.

P Martiat1, J L Michaux, J Rodhain.   

Abstract

To better understand the Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and its relationships with Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) CML and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), a study was undertaken by the Groupe Français de Cytogénétique Hématologique. Thirty-five Ph- CML patients were investigated and compared with 55 chronic phase Ph+ CML and 100 CMML patients. There were 12 M-BCR positive (M-BCR+) and 23 M-BCR negative (MBCR+) patients. No clinical or biologic differences were found between Ph+ and Ph-, M-BCR+ patients. In the Ph- group, M-BCR+ and M-BCR- patients differed significantly in age (47.7 +/- 6.6 v 67.0 +/- 6.1 years, respectively; P = .001), leukocytosis (153.4 +/- 135.1 v 58.5 +/- 37.7 10(9)/L, P = .002), relative monocytosis (1.8% +/- 1.2% v 5.6% +/- 1.4%, P = .048), absolute basophilia (8.5 +/- 9.7 v 0.9 +/- 1.5 10(9)/L, P = .001), percentage of immature myeloid precursors (IMP) in peripheral blood (29.0% +/- 9.5% v 15.3% +/- 8.1%, P = .001), and percentage of erythroblasts in bone marrow (BM) (6.5% +/- 3.5% v 14.6% +/- 3.6%, P = .001). Karyotypic abnormalities other than the Ph chromosome occurred in 0 of 12 M-BCR- at diagnosis and 7 of 23 M-BCR- Ph- CML (P = .033). None of the 13 investigated BCR- patients had detectable BCR/ABL transcripts using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and none had an N-RAS mutation. Cytologic findings showed a marked morphologic difference between M-BCR+ and M-BCR- patients, especially in the monocytic lineage. Dysmyelopoietic features in CMML and M-BCR- patients were very similar, and the differences were of quantitative order only. Using four criteria (monocytosis, percentage of IMP, basophilia, and percentage of erythroblasts in BM), patients could be divided into typical and atypical CML and this classification correlated well with molecular findings. We conclude that, while Ph-, M-BCR+, and Ph+ CML are identical diseases, Ph-, M-BCR- CML, and CMML have many similarities and might be only different aspects of a same entity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2070054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  15 in total

1.  Characteristics and survival of BCR/ABL negative chronic myeloid leukemia: a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.

Authors:  Smith Giri; Ranjan Pathak; Mike G Martin; Vijaya Raj Bhatt
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: novel pathogenetic lesions.

Authors:  Hideki Muramatsu; Hideki Makishima; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Ph-negative and bcr-negative atypical chronic myelogenous leukemia: biological features and clinical outcome.

Authors:  E Montefusco; G Alimena; F Lo Coco; M R De Cuia; Y Z Wang; M A Aloe Spiriti; F Mancini; M Cedrone; M Mancini; F Mandelli
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 4.  Treatment of MDS/MPN and the MDS/MPN IWG International Trial: ABNL MARRO.

Authors:  Andrew T Kuykendall; Eric Padron
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 5.  An Exercise in Extrapolation: Clinical Management of Atypical CML, MDS/MPN-Unclassifiable, and MDS/MPN-RS-T.

Authors:  Chetasi Talati; Eric Padron
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 6.  The new genetics of chronic neutrophilic leukemia and atypical CML: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Jason Gotlib; Julia E Maxson; Tracy I George; Jeffrey W Tyner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  The detection of CD14 and CD16 in paraffin-embedded bone marrow biopsies is useful for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Marwan Qubaja; Béatrice Marmey; Agnès Le Tourneau; Stéphanie Haiat; Dominique Cazals-Hatem; Bettina Fabiani; Jacques Diebold; Jean-Pierre Marie; Josée Audouin; Frédéric Geissmann; Thierry Jo Molina
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Deletion of ABL/BCR on der(9) associated with severe basophilia.

Authors:  Shantashri Vaidya; Manisha Madkaikar; Kanjaksha Ghosh; Babu Rao Vundinti
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-05

Review 9.  Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Juliane Menezes; Juan Cruz Cigudosa
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Protein signatures as potential surrogate biomarkers for stratification and prediction of treatment response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Ayodele A Alaiya; Mahmoud Aljurf; Zakia Shinwari; Fahad Almohareb; Hafiz Malhan; Hazzaa Alzahrani; Tarek Owaidah; Jonathan Fox; Fahad Alsharif; Said Y Mohamed; Walid Rasheed; Ghuzayel Aldawsari; Amr Hanbali; Syed Osman Ahmed; Naeem Chaudhri
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.