Literature DB >> 20700381

Research on flux of dry atmospheric falling dust and its characterization in a subtropical city, Guangzhou, South China.

Jinping Zhao, Ping'an Peng, Jianzhong Song, Shexia Ma, Guoying Sheng, Jiamo Fu.   

Abstract

Guangzhou is the central city in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), China, and is one of the most polluted cities in the world. To characterize the ambient falling dust pollution, two typical sampling sites: urban (Wushan) and suburban (University Town) areas in Guangzhou city were chosen for falling dust collection over 1 year at time intervals of 1 or 2 months. The flux of dry deposition was calculated. In addition, mineral composition and morphology of atmospheric falling dust were studied by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and microscopic observation. The results revealed that the dust flux in Guangzhou city was 3.34-3.78 g/(m(2) month) during the study period. The main minerals in the dust were quartz, illite, calcite, kaolinite, gypsum, plagioclase, dolomite, and amorphous matter. The morphological types included grained and flaky individual minerals, chain-like aggregates, spherical flying beads, and irregular aggregates, with the chain-like and spherical aggregates indicators of industrial ash. The major dusts were derived from industrial and construction activities. The gypsum present in the dust collected in winter season was not only derived from cement dust but may also have originated from the reaction of calcic material with sulfuric acids resulting from photooxidation of SO(x) and NO(x), which confirmed serious air pollution due to SO(x) and NO(x) in Guangzhou. The abatement of fossil fuel combustion emissions and construction dust will have a significant beneficial effect on dust reduction.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700381      PMCID: PMC2914287          DOI: 10.1007/s11869-009-0062-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health        ISSN: 1873-9318            Impact factor:   3.763


Introduction

In recent years, worldwide concerns over air quality have increased research in the area of atmospheric particulate characterization (Boevski et al. 2000; Donahue et al. 2009). Atmospheric falling dust is a generalized component of atmospheric particles, which are particles fallen to the ground due to their own gravitation. The diameter of these particles is more than 10 μm and less than 100 μm. From an aerodynamic point of view, pollutants which are carried by falling dust may cause near-source pollution resulting from dust particles which are easily deposited. Therefore, dust deposition has important significance as an indicator of environment quality (Vento and Dachs 2007; Wang 2003). Atmospheric falling dust has a complex mineral and chemical composition because it is derived from different sources and processes (Abed et al. 2009; Chen and Xu 2003). Falling dust particles may provide reaction sites for many heterogeneous reactions involving SO2, NO, O3, etc. and serve as conveyors carrying anthropogenic substances a distance from their sources (Sullivan et al. 2007). Such reactions could cause certain modifications in the properties of both dust and anthropogenic aerosols. Therefore, studies on sources, compositions, and the content of falling dust are necessary for the risk assessment of dust to atmospheric quality, ecology, and human health. The characterization of falling dust is also relevant in the study of global climate change because the degree of the dust–climate effects are dominated by the chemical and physical properties of mineral particles, including their type, size, chemical composition, morphology, and particle number concentration (Sokolik and Toon 1999). These effects have sparked interest in atmospheric falling dust, and it has become an object for multidisciplinary study such as environmental science, environmental engineering, atmospheric physics and chemistry, and geochemistry (Menon et al. 2002; Vento and Dachs 2007). Atmospheric falling dust includes dry and wet dust, of which wet dust has been widely researched and documented in the literature (Hope 2008; Chantara and Chunsuk 2008). Research into the process of dry deposition is obviously weaker than that of wet deposition (Sabin and Schiff 2008; Wang 2003), and measurements of dry falling dust and its mineral constituents in atmospheric particles in Guangzhou are scarce and limited. A detailed characterization of dry falling dust is also lacking in samples collected from urban areas or suburban areas in this region. The purpose of this work was to measure the flux of dry falling dust in Guangzhou. Analyses were carried out using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), microscopic observation, and particle size distribution; mineral constituents, morphological characteristics and possible sources of the dusts in Guangzhou were also studied. The characterization of dry falling dust would have significance for air pollution control in Guangzhou.

Experimental

Sample collection

Dust samples were collected from two sites in Guangzhou city, PR China: Wushan (WS) in Tianhe district and University Town (UT) in Panyu district. WS represents an urban area and is surrounded by highways, schools, residential buildings, office buildings, and industrial factories. The main sources of air pollution at this site are thought to be anthropogenic. Samples were collected on the roof of a library building 18 m above the ground. UT represents a suburban area and is located at the boundary between urban and rural areas and surrounded by many universities. The main sources of air pollution at this site are a mixture of anthropogenic and biological. Samples were collected on the roof of a five-storey building in South China Normal University 23 m above the ground. The roof of each building was selected for sampling as it received natural falling dust and avoided secondary fugitive dust. The sampling sites were cleaned when one sample collection was finished and the next sample is collected. The dust collected passed a 0.28-mm sieve to remove large leaf debris and stored in a brown bottle containing desiccators until use. Falling dust was collected for 1 year at time intervals of 1 or 2 months at WS and UT between April 2006 and May 2007. A total of 16 samples were collected.

Methods

Flux of dry falling dust

In order to determine the contribution of dry falling dust to the environment, the flux of the falling dust (g/m2) was calculated. The flux was calculated using the following equation for atmospheric falling dust: D = M/A, where D is the deposition flux in gram per square meter, M is the weight (g) of the dry falling dust during each sampling period, and A is the area of the sampling sites in square meter.

X-ray diffraction

Mineralogical analyses of atmospheric falling dusts were performed using XRD. XRD tests were conducted using a Japan-made D/MAX-IIIA powder diffractometer with a Bragg-Bentano θ:2θ configuration, using a Cu target tube and a graphite monochromator. Samples were analyzed within the range 10–70°, with two tube voltage 10 kV, tube electric flow 30 mA, scan rate 10º/min, and a wide sampling step 0.02º. XRD plots and MDI Jade 5 software were used for peak recognition, mineral identification, and peak intensity calculations.

Petrographic examination

The facies, shapes, and sizes of the falling dust were also examined under an optical microscope (Leitz MPV-3) in two different modes: reflected and fluorescent; the latter was induced by blue light excitation (546 nm). Thin sections of the falling dust were used for examinations in fluorescent mode and were prepared by evenly spreading falling dust powders onto glass slides, which were then cemented with glycerol and covered with a cover glass. The polished sections used for the reflected and fluorescent modes were prepared by spreading the dust powders onto porcelain slides and cementing the powders with low-fluorescence 502 mucilage glue. The slides were then thin-sectioned and polished.

Scanning electron microscopy

The sizes, morphology, and elemental composition of falling dust particles in different samples were examined using a Japan-made S-3700 N SEM with Oxford Link INCA 300 energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS).

Particle size measurement

A Beckman Coulter LS 13320, a laser diffraction-based particle size analyzer, was used to measure particle size. In order to avoid dissolution of particles in water, a dry powder system was used for this measurement. The Beckman Coulter LS 13320 software (version 5.01) was used for operation and data analyses. Particle sizes ranging from 0.375 to 2,000 μm in diameter were measured. All particle sizes reported here were based on the volume distribution of the particles.

Results and discussion

The flux of atmospheric falling dust

Many scientists have studied the source and the physical and chemical properties of atmospheric particulate matter (Hueglin et al. 2005; Shi et al. 2006). The studies in the literature on falling dust have mainly focused on dust storm events, such as the studies on dust particle size influenced by sea salt during dust storms, and long-distance transmission of dust (Zhang and Iwasaka 2004; Lee et al. 2007). Although some studies have reported dust flux (Sauret et al. 2009), inorganic mineral composition (Krueger et al. 2004), and particle size distribution (Iijima et al. 2007), the majority of studies in the Chinese literature have concentrated on the northern Loess Plateau cities (Zhang et al. 2006; Sun et al. 2001) and not on falling dust in southern large- and medium-sized cities, such as Guangzhou. It can be seen from Table 1 that the flux value for each month ranged from 1.90 to 9.36 g/(m2 month), with an average monthly flux of 3.34–3.78 g/(m2 month), and the yearly flux was 40.10–45.36 g/(m2 year). These data are higher than those reported by Inomata et al. (2009), who studied the dry deposition fluxes in Tsukuba, a coastal city in Japan and found that the flux was 0.08–3.00 g/(m2 month). The monthly changes in flux for falling dust between WS and UT was variable. There was a higher flux of falling dust in October 2006 than in the other sampling months in UT because there was a construction site near the UT sampling site around October, which may have contributed to the higher flux found during that month, whereas the flux of falling dust in May 2006 in WS was higher than in any other month, which may have been due to frequent haze days which exacerbated the pollution of dust deposition in the spring of 2006 in WS.
Table 1

Flux of dry atmospheric falling dust in WS and UT during May 2006–May 2007

Sampling time (month/year)WS (g/m2)UT (g/m2)
May 20064.172.53
September 20062.874.43
October 20063.839.36
December 20062.452.99
January 20073.334.76
March 20073.131.90
May 20073.071.56
Average flux in summer montha 2.48 ± 5.58b 2.58 ± 2.54
Average flux in winter montha 3.58 ± 1.344.74 ± 1.95
Average monthly flux3.34 ± 0.453.78 ± 1.91
Average flux for the year40.1045.36

aGuangzhou is governed by monsoon weather, and therefore the year can be divided into two seasons, e.g., summer and winter. Summer included May, June, July, August, September, and October; winter included November, December, January, February, March, and April

bAverage ± SD

Flux of dry atmospheric falling dust in WS and UT during May 2006–May 2007 aGuangzhou is governed by monsoon weather, and therefore the year can be divided into two seasons, e.g., summer and winter. Summer included May, June, July, August, September, and October; winter included November, December, January, February, March, and April bAverage ± SD During the year, we can see that the lower flux value was in September at the urban sampling site, which may have been associated with frequent rain and less accumulated particulate matter during the summer in Guangzhou. WS, the urban sampling site, was mainly affected by a large volume of traffic, and the concentrations of particulate matter pollution from vehicle exhaust emission as well as road dust were not clearly different in the two seasons; therefore, there was no obvious change in the monthly flux. However, the suburban site, UT, was not only influenced by anthropogenic activity but also by biological activity (e.g., agricultural activity). Therefore, changes in falling dust flux in UT were obviously higher each month than that in WS. According to the seasonal variation in dust flux, we can also see that dust pollution in the winter season was higher than that in the summer season (Table 1). The fluxes of falling dust in UT in winter and summer were 4.74 and 2.58 g/(m2 month), respectively. The reasons for this difference may be due to the strong winds and dry climate conditions which led to an increase in dust deposition in winter. On the other hand, frequent temperature inversion and haze days in the winter in Guangzhou also provided atmospheric conditions for cumulative particulate matter in Guangzhou, whereas frequent rain in summer decreased dust pollution. A previous study (Sun et al. 2001) indicated that the normal level of falling dust in the Loess Plateau may reflect the background characterization of particulate matter in atmospheric dust from the origin area to the deposition region, which was mainly controlled by high-altitude airflow. Falling dust occurred during dust storm events mainly controlled by monsoon circulation which was only transported in the near-surface airflow. In the southern cities which are away from sources of dust storms, the normal falling dust therefore reflected the background characterization of particulate matter in the atmosphere in the deposition region and was controlled by regional anthropogenic activity and low atmospheric circulation. The falling dust flux in the suburban area indicated that it was influenced by near sources from anthropogenic and biological activity much more than far sources which are contributed by high-altitude atmospheric circulation.

Minerals in atmospheric falling dust

Atmospheric falling dust with a complex mineral composition was the deposition of atmospheric aerosols, which had complex sources that can be divided into natural and anthropogenic sources. Atmospheric falling dusts are different in particulate morphology and mineral composition, and the sources of the falling dust can be determined (Chen and Xu 2003; Zhang et al. 2009; Gomez et al. 2004). Figure 1 shows representative XRD spectra of the samples from WS and UT. The minerals contained in the falling dust can be determined by their 2θ angle of the diffraction peak. Similarly, relative mineral content can be estimated using the intensity of diffraction peaks. The error was less than 10%. The semiquantitative analysis of minerals is shown in Table 2. The main minerals in Guangzhou dry falling dust were quartz, gypsum, calcite, plagioclase, illite, kaolinite, dolomite, and amorphous material.
Fig. 1

XRD of the atmospheric falling dust. I illite, G gypsum, C chlorite, K kaolinite, Q quartz, P plagioclase, C calcite, D dolomite. Samples were named according to the sampling site (UT, WS) and sampling time (year and month). For example, UT0606 means that the sample was collected in UT in June 2006

Table 2

Composition and relative content of minerals in dry falling dust in WS and UT, Guangzhou (W B/%)

SamplesQuartzGypsumCalcitePlagioclaseIlliteKaoliniteDolomite
WS
 Average for summer a 80.9 ± 2.8b 3.8 ± 1.49.8 ± 2.72.1 ± 0.41.3 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.3
 Average for winter80.8 ± 1.95.0 ± 1.19.5 ± 1.32.5 ± 1.01.4 ± 0.60.9 ± 0.40.0 ± 0.0
 Average for whole year80.9 ± 2.54.4 ± 1.49.7 ± 2.12.3 ± 0.81.3 ± 0.50.9 ± 0.42.4 ± 0.3
UT
 Average for summer73.2 ± 5.97.9 ± 3.410.3 ± 2.52.7 ± 1.11.7 ± 0.81.2 ± 0.53.9 ± 1.5
 Average for winter76.0 ± 3.29.0 ± 2.28.6 ± 2.41.7 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.21.0 ± 0.15.0 ± 0.9
 Average for whole year74.6 ± 5.08.5 ± 2.99.4 ± 2.62.2 ± 1.01.6 ± 0.61.1 ± 0.44.4 ± 1.4

aSummer included May, June, July, August, September, and October; winter included November, December, January, February, March, and April

bAverage ± SD

XRD of the atmospheric falling dust. I illite, G gypsum, C chlorite, K kaolinite, Q quartz, P plagioclase, C calcite, D dolomite. Samples were named according to the sampling site (UT, WS) and sampling time (year and month). For example, UT0606 means that the sample was collected in UT in June 2006 Composition and relative content of minerals in dry falling dust in WS and UT, Guangzhou (W B/%) aSummer included May, June, July, August, September, and October; winter included November, December, January, February, March, and April bAverage ± SD Illite and other clay minerals are water-bearing silicate minerals, which are unstable in a high-temperature environment. Therefore, it is not possible for illite to exist in industrial smoke or dust, the existence of such minerals in dry falling dust indicated that the source of the dust was from the ground which contributed to atmospheric particulate matter. Quartz and plagioclase as silicate minerals are stable under high temperature and can be present in industrial smoke. Quartz is also a common mineral in all soils. Road dust may therefore be another main source of quartz. Kaolinite, calcite, and dolomite may exist in fugitive dust from ground and industrial dusts. The sources of quartz, plagioclase, kaolinite, calcite, and dolomite can be further identified by morphology. The amorphous material in atmospheric particulate matter is a typical product of a high-temperature process, and therefore these amorphous matters can be used as a marker of industrial smoke and dust. As discussed in the following section, most quartz, plagioclase, kaolinite, calcite, and dolomite minerals were present in the samples in an amorphous state. Therefore, they were mostly derived from anthropogenic activities and only partly from the soil. General similarities of mineral composition in dust of WS and UT support this conclusion (Table 2). If dust were derived from the soil, the mineral composition would change geographically (Belozerova 2009). However, a recognizable gypsum peak, occurring in the XRD spectra, was in the samples collected in winter from UT. It is known that gypsum is a common additive in cements at a concentration less than 4% (Panigrahy et al. 2003; Chen 2008). Therefore, a higher percentage of gypsum in UT samples shown in Table 2 demonstrated that the gypsum was not only from construction dust, but most of the gypsum was formed from the reaction of sulfuric acids with calcic material. This indicated the serious emission of SO and NO and photochemical oxidation of SO and NO into corresponding acids in Guangzhou. From Table 2, we also can see that the average relative content of quartz in UT was lower than that in WS, which may be associated with high gypsum in UT.

Petrographic examination analysis

Atmospheric falling dusts were identified based on the characteristics observed under the petrographic microscope in reflected and fluorescent modes. Major observations and representative appearance, shape, and partial minerals are shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Microphotographs of falling dust under reflecting (ref.) and fluorescent (flu.) mode microscopy. UT0609, UT0612, WS0609, WS0701, and WS0703 represent falling dust samples collected in UT in September and December 2006 and in WS in September 2006 and January and March 2007. “-1” and “-2” represent the first and second microphotographs of the same sample. a Organic matter with dendritic structure; b pyrites with yellowish color; c spherical black carbon with cellular structure; d amorphous quartz with high reflectance; e black carbon with macroporous and dendritic structures and vitrinite macerals with low reflectance; f plant cell walls with high fluorescence; g clay mineral and feldspar with medium reflectance; h gypsum with smooth surface and slim-lined structure. i amorphous flocculation (e.g., fly ash) with low reflectance and gypsum with medium reflectance

Microphotographs of falling dust under reflecting (ref.) and fluorescent (flu.) mode microscopy. UT0609, UT0612, WS0609, WS0701, and WS0703 represent falling dust samples collected in UT in September and December 2006 and in WS in September 2006 and January and March 2007. “-1” and “-2” represent the first and second microphotographs of the same sample. a Organic matter with dendritic structure; b pyrites with yellowish color; c spherical black carbon with cellular structure; d amorphous quartz with high reflectance; e black carbon with macroporous and dendritic structures and vitrinite macerals with low reflectance; f plant cell walls with high fluorescence; g clay mineral and feldspar with medium reflectance; h gypsum with smooth surface and slim-lined structure. i amorphous flocculation (e.g., fly ash) with low reflectance and gypsum with medium reflectance Char-black carbon which had a spherical and hole-shaped structure (UT0612-1 and WS0609 in Fig. 2) was the most common particle in the falling dust samples, which had a strong light reflectance similar to that of fusinite structure. There was also irregular organic matter that showed branch bark structure (UT0609-1 in Fig. 2); its intensity of light reflectance was lower than the reflected light of fusinite. WS0703-1 showed abundant gypsum with a smooth surface and medium reflectance, which was formed from cement dust or the reaction of sulfuric acids with calcic mineral. WS0703-2 was possibly amorphous organic flocculation that may have originated from automobile exhaust or factory chimney pollutant emissions. Quartz also had a very strong light reflectance under reflected microscopy (UT0612-2 in Fig. 2) and had an irregular shape and smooth surface with a high-temperature origin. The shapes of other materials and inorganic minerals under reflected light were varied (UT0609-1 and UT0609-2 in Fig. 2) and displayed different light reflectance. UT0609-2 contained pyrite, which indicated the dust contribution from coal combustion in power plants. The organic matter in WS0609 (flu.) was transparent under fluorescence microscopy which showed information on the cell wall of plants. Based on the observations under the microscope, we can conclude that anthropogenic activity was the main source contributing to dust pollution in WS and UT sampling sites.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis

Figure 3 shows SEM images of four falling dust samples which illustrate the diversity of dust particulate matter. (1) Monomineral with a sheet or granular structures (Fig. 3a–d). These particulate matters may be attributed to clay mineral particles according to their morphology, which represented a source of dust from the ground. (2) Chain-like aggregates (Fig. 3a, g, h) with a large number of submicron particle compositions. Kasparian et al. (1998) and Bérubé et al. (1999) thought that these aggregates were soot aggregates and automobile exhaust particles. (3) The sizes of alveolate and spherical cenosphere particles (Fig. 3b, d, e) were variable; some reached more than 10 μm and were derived from diesel exhaust or coal-fired fly ash. According to EDS (Fig. 3c) analysis, the main composition of these spherical floating particles were O, K, Si, and Al, with a small amount of Cl, S, Ca, and Ti, which were derived from soot from coal-fired plants. This result was consistent with the findings of Okada et al. (2005). (4) The irregular granular aggregates (Fig. 3h) may have been derived from ground dust or from construction dust. It is interesting to note that the spherical fly ash particles shown in Fig. 3c were hollow glass particles, which are a distinctive indicator of coal combustion.
Fig. 3

Scanning electron microscopic photographs of the dry falling dust (a) BC particle with different minerals (UT0609). b Large BC particle with a smooth, spherical-shaped surface and macroporous structures (WS0609). c BC particles with irregular shapes and amorphous organic flocculation on the BC and with mineral particles situated in holes (WS0609). d Fly ash particles with smooth, spherical-shaped structures and with mineral particles situated in holes (WS0701). e BC particle with layered structures and with mineral particles or fly ash situated in holes (WS0701). f BC, amorphous organic flocculation with elongated/layered structures and a flat surface (UT0612). g Fly ash with mineral particles situated in holes. h Different minerals with elongated/layered structures and a flat surface (UT0612)

Scanning electron microscopic photographs of the dry falling dust (a) BC particle with different minerals (UT0609). b Large BC particle with a smooth, spherical-shaped surface and macroporous structures (WS0609). c BC particles with irregular shapes and amorphous organic flocculation on the BC and with mineral particles situated in holes (WS0609). d Fly ash particles with smooth, spherical-shaped structures and with mineral particles situated in holes (WS0701). e BC particle with layered structures and with mineral particles or fly ash situated in holes (WS0701). f BC, amorphous organic flocculation with elongated/layered structures and a flat surface (UT0612). g Fly ash with mineral particles situated in holes. h Different minerals with elongated/layered structures and a flat surface (UT0612) The large and relatively compact soot particle in Fig. 3b shows the morphology and size of soot particles which reflected the influence of anthropogenic sources, in particular fossil fuel burning, which was the main constituent of this falling dust. In addition, biomass burning may be another source of soot, whose characteristic shape was similar to that of laminated sheets (Fig. 3e and f); however, the contribution of biomass burning was less than that of fossil fuel burning, which also suggested that industrial activity was the main source affecting dust pollution in the urban and suburban areas of Guangzhou. According to the results of the EDS analysis, mineral particles were mainly quartz, gypsum, calcite, and the aluminum silicate minerals (e.g., kaolinite, montmorillonite). Due to limitations in the experimental conditions, we could not detect the entire mineral composition. However, we have seen that the mineral composition of atmospheric particulate matter is complex and has many more mineral types than detected by Quinn et al. (2004).

Particle size analysis

Table 3 shows the volume percentages of different particle sizes in the dust. The size distribution was bimodal, with a pronounced peak at 1.15–2.01 and 27.39–36.21 μm, with the exception of UT0703 which was dominated by particles size of 18.86 μm. Table 3 also shows that the diameter of the main particles in falling dust in Guangzhou ranged from 20 to 50 μm. Particle sizes less than 50, 10, and 3 μm accounted for 100%, 13.4–24.7%, and 2.8–13.7% of the total particles, respectively (Table 3). Thus, it can be seen that the pollution of inhalable particles (dynamics diameter less than 10 μm, PM10), which is harmful to human health, is serious in Guangzhou.
Table 3

The grain size of falling dust in Guangzhou city

SamplesRelative contents of different-sized particles (V/%)Average size (μm)
≥50 μm20–50 μm10–20 μm5–10 μm3–5 μm1–3 μm≤1 μm
WS0609a 037.527.415.25.49.55.016.2
WS0703039.726.813.45.09.85.316.7
UT0609029.028.921.77.28.64.614.4
UT06120.0343.329.815.35.32.83.518.6
UT0703010.234.824.79.013.77.69.8

aFor sample numbers, see Table 1

The grain size of falling dust in Guangzhou city aFor sample numbers, see Table 1

Conclusions

Based on the flux and characterization studies of dust samples collected at urban and suburban sites in Guangzhou from April 2006 to May 2007, the following conclusions can be drawn: The average monthly fluxes of dry falling dust in WS and UT were 3.34–3.78 g/(m2 month), and the mean yearly flux was 40.10–45.36 g/(m2 year). The dust flux in the winter season was higher than that in the summer season. XRD analysis showed that the inorganic minerals in dry falling dust were quartz, illite, calcite, kaolinite, gypsum, plagioclase, dolomite, and amorphous matter, of which quartz accounted for the highest proportion and gypsum was also high. The massive amount of gypsum detected in the samples from UT suggested the presence of SO pollution in the suburban of Guangzhou. Petrographic examinations and SEM analyses indicated that there were high levels of organic matter in the dust in addition to inorganic minerals such as gypsum and clay. They had higher reflectance of black carbon and fly ash particles and lower reflectance of amorphous organic matter. The composition and morphology of minerals and organic matter provided information on the source of the dust. Granular and sheet single minerals were markers of road dust, and chain aggregates and spherical particles were markers of industrial smoke dust, while irregular granular aggregates were markers of construction dust. Our results indicated that most dust compositions in Guangzhou were derived from anthropogenic activities. Therefore, the abatement of fossil fuel combustion emissions and construction dust will have a significant beneficial effect on dust reduction in Guangzhou. This will improve air quality since 13.4–24.7% (in volume) of dusts are PM10 which is harmful to human health.
  3 in total

1.  Atmospheric occurrence and deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the northeast tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Sabino Del Vento; Jordi Dachs
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Comparison of annual dry and wet deposition fluxes of selected pesticides in Strasbourg, France.

Authors:  Nathalie Sauret; Henri Wortham; Rafal Strekowski; Pierre Herckès; Laura Ines Nieto
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  A model for the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the Willamette River Basin (Oregon).

Authors:  Bruce K Hope
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of metal contamination and the associated human health risk from dustfall deposition: a study in a mid-sized town in India.

Authors:  Neha Rani; Bhamidipati S Sastry; Kaushik Dey
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Environmental study of two significant solid samples: gravitation dust sediment and soil.

Authors:  Dagmar Remeteiová; Radoslav Rusnák; Eva Kucanová; Beáta Fióová; Silvia Ružičková; Ilona Fekete; Márk Horváth; Vojtech Dirner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.