Literature DB >> 20699623

The standardized uptake value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after chemoradiation and clinical outcome in patients with localized gastroesophageal carcinoma.

Santosh B Murthy1, Srikrishna V Patnana, Lianchun Xiao, Eric Rohren, Wayne L Hofstetter, Stephen G Swisher, Zhongxing Liao, Jeffrey H Lee, Manoop S Bhutani, Homer A Macapinlac, Xuemei Wang, Jaffer A Ajani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empirical trimodality (TM) or bimodality (BM) approaches lead to unpredictable outcomes in patients with localized gastroesophageal carcinoma (LGC). We hypothesized that the standardized uptake value (SUV) of positron emission tomography (PET) after chemoradiation would define the clinical outcome in patients.
METHODS: We analyzed 272 (TM = 155 and BM = 117) LGC patients after chemoradiation PET and studied its association with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The log-rank test, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, and Kaplan-Meier survival plots were used to analyze the dichotomized data (using the median as a cutoff).
RESULTS: The median survival of TM patients was 49 months (95% CI: 36 to not reached) and that of BM patients was 20 months (95% CI: 15-34; p < 0.0001); however, if the postchemoradiation SUV was <4.6 (4.6 = median SUV), the OS of TM and BM patients was not significantly different (p = 0.22). In the multivariate Cox model, postchemoradiation SUV (p = 0.02), baseline stage (p = 0.03), histology grade (p = 0.01), and having surgery (p = 0.004) were independent prognosticators for OS and DFS.
CONCLUSIONS: These data document that the low postchemoradiation SUV in both TM and BM patients defines clinical aggression and has a similar clinical outcome. Systematic validation of PET changes, in this setting, can facilitate individualization of therapy of LGC patients. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20699623     DOI: 10.1159/000319938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  10 in total

1.  A nomogram that predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation also predicts survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Jingya Wang; Pamela K Allen; Arlene M Correa; Dipen M Maru; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne L Hofstetter; Zhongxing Liao; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 2.  Clinical tools to predict outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation: are we there yet?

Authors:  Abraham J Wu; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 3.  A systematic review of the predictive value of (18)FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification.

Authors:  Pascaline Schollaert; Ralph Crott; Claude Bertrand; Lionel D'Hondt; Thierry Vander Borght; Bruno Krug
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Current strategies in chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Lloyd; Bryan W Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

5.  Initial Standardized Uptake Value of Positron Emission Tomography Influences the Prognosis of Patients with Localized Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated Preoperatively.

Authors:  Nikolaos Charalampakis; Lianchun Xiao; Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Mariela A Blum; Venkatram Planjery; Jane E Rogers; Aurelio Matamoros; Tara Sagebiel; Prajnan Das; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Brian D Badgwell; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Akihiro Suzuki; Lianchun Xiao; Yuki Hayashi; Homer A Macapinlac; James Welsh; Steven H Lin; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with localised oesophagogastric junction cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiation:a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  W Zhu; L Xing; J Yue; X Sun; X Sun; H Zhao; J Yu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J A Ajani; A M Correa; W L Hofstetter; D C Rice; M A Blum; A Suzuki; T Taketa; J Welsh; S H Lin; J H Lee; M S Bhutani; W A Ross; D M Maru; H A Macapinlac; J Erasmus; R Komaki; R J Mehran; A A Vaporciyan; S G Swisher
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable oesophageal cancer: A mono-institutional study on 40 patients.

Authors:  Sara Torrente; Lucia Turri; Letizia Deantonio; Tiziana Cena; Giuseppina Gambaro; Corrado Magnani; Marco Krengli
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-05-22

10.  Post-chemoradiotherapy FDG PET with qualitative interpretation criteria for outcome stratification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yung-Cheng Huang; Shau-Hsuan Li; Hung-I Lu; Chien-Chin Hsu; Yu-Ming Wang; Wei-Che Lin; Chao-Jung Chen; Kuo-Wei Ho; Nan-Tsing Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.