Literature DB >> 20698383

Retention of colonoscopy skills after virtual reality simulator training by independent and proctored methods.

Christopher W Snyder1, Marianne J Vandromme, Sharon L Tyra, Mary T Hawn.   

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) simulators may enhance surgical resident colonoscopy skills, but the duration of skill retention and the effects of different simulator training methods are unknown. Medical students participating in a randomized trial of independent (automated simulator feedback only) versus proctored (human expert feedback plus simulator feedback) simulator training performed a standardized VR colonoscopy scenario at baseline, at the end of training (posttraining), and after a median 4.5 months without practice (retention). Performances were scored on a 10-point scale based on expert proficiency criteria and compared for the independent and proctored groups. Thirteen trainees (8 proctored, 5 independent) were included. Performance at retention testing was significantly better than baseline (median score 10 vs. 5, P < 0.0001), and no different from posttraining (median score 10 vs. 10, P = 0.19). Score changes from baseline to retention and from posttraining to retention were no different for the proctored and independent groups. Overinsufflation and excessive force were the most common reasons for nonproficiency at retention. After proficiency-based VR simulator training, colonoscopy skills are retained for several months, regardless of whether an independent or proctored approach is used. Error avoidance skills may not be retained as well as speed and efficiency skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20698383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  11 in total

Review 1.  Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Sonja N Buzink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Simulation-based training for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial: virtual-reality versus black-box simulation.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; Charlotte Ringsted; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Lazaros Dimitrios Lazaridis; George D Dimitriadis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-01-16

4.  Simulator Training in Interventional Cardiology.

Authors:  Abhishek Joshi; Andrew Wragg
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

5.  Assessing Competency and Training of Upper Endoscopy in a General Surgery Residency Program.

Authors:  William F Powers; W Borden Hooks; S Nicole Kilbourne; Thomas V Clancy; William W Hope
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2013-10-31

6.  Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS).

Authors:  Sabina Beg; Krish Ragunath; Andrew Wyman; Matthew Banks; Nigel Trudgill; D Mark Pritchard; Stuart Riley; John Anderson; Helen Griffiths; Pradeep Bhandari; Phillip Kaye; Andrew Veitch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Identification of cecum time-location in a colonoscopy video by deep learning analysis of colonoscope movement.

Authors:  Hyoun-Joong Kong; Sungwan Kim; Minwoo Cho; Jee Hyun Kim; Kyoung Sup Hong; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  "Best practice" skills lab training vs. a "see one, do one" approach in undergraduate medical education: an RCT on students' long-term ability to perform procedural clinical skills.

Authors:  Anne Herrmann-Werner; Christoph Nikendei; Katharina Keifenheim; Hans Martin Bosse; Frederike Lund; Robert Wagner; Nora Celebi; Stephan Zipfel; Peter Weyrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Effective colonoscopy training techniques: strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Pantelis S Karatzas; Lazaros T Varytimiadis; Athanasios Tsigaridas; Michail Galanopoulos; Nikos Viazis; Dimitrios G Karamanolis
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-03-29

10.  Colonoscopy procedure simulation: virtual reality training based on a real time computational approach.

Authors:  Tingxi Wen; David Medveczky; Jackie Wu; Jianhuang Wu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.