Literature DB >> 20697822

Impact of circumferential resection margin distance on locoregional recurrence and survival after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Yin-Kai Chao1, Chi-Ju Yeh, Hsien-Kun Chang, Chen-Kan Tseng, Yin-Yi Chu, Ming-Ju Hsieh, Yi-Cheng Wu, Hui-Ping Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Close circumferential resection margin (CRM) is an established predictor for locoregional recurrence (LR) in rectal cancer but remains controversial in esophageal malignancy. As yet, little is known about the significance of CRM after chemoradiotherapy (CRT), especially in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This study investigated the relationship between CRM distance and recurrence after neoadjuvant CRT in esophageal SCC patients.
METHODS: Between 1997 and 2005, esophageal SCC patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant CRT and with pathology stage T3N0M0 and T3N1M0 (metastatic lymph nodes <2) were selected. CRM distance was reassessed and divided into three groups (group 1: CRM >1 mm, group 2: uninvolved CRM but <1 mm, group 3: CRM involved).
RESULTS: The cohort comprised 145 male and 6 female patients with mean age of 57 years. There were 74, 51, and 26 patients in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. With median follow-up period of 50 months, LR developed in 30.5% of patients. Both group 2 and group 3 had significantly higher LR than group 1 (37 and 42% vs. 21%, P < 0.05). Meanwhile, mean time from operation to recurrence was also significantly shorter in group 2 and group 3 than in group 1 (267 and 269 days versus 402 days, P < 0.05). Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was highest in group 1 (40%). Despite the similarity in LR, 5-year DSS significantly differed between group 2 and group 3 (22 vs. 7%, P < 0.05). The higher rate of distant recurrence (DR) and concomitant LR + DR in group 3 accounted for the survival difference.
CONCLUSION: In ypT3 esophageal SCC patients, CRM distance provides useful information for risk stratification in cancer recurrence and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20697822     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1244-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Matthew H G Katz; Huamin Wang; Aparna Balachandran; Priya Bhosale; Christopher H Crane; Xuemei Wang; Peter W T Pisters; Jeffrey E Lee; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Robert Wolff; James Abbruzzese; Gauri Varadhachary; Xavier Chopin-Laly; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Won Beom Jung; Chang Sik Yu; Seok Byung Lim; In Ja Park; Yong Sik Yoon; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The Impact of CT-Assessed Liver Steatosis on Postoperative Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Guarneri; Diego Palumbo; Nicolò Pecorelli; Francesco Prato; Chiara Gritti; Raffaele Cerchione; Domenico Tamburrino; Stefano Partelli; Stefano Crippa; Michele Reni; Francesco De Cobelli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Prognostic role of initial pan-endoscopic tumor length at diagnosis in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Chen-Sung Lin; Chao-Yu Liu; Chih-Tao Cheng; Yu-Chen Tsai; Lun-Wei Chiou; Ming-Yuan Lee; Chia-Chuan Liu; Chih-Hsun Shih
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography.

Authors:  T D Reid; D S Y Chan; S A Roberts; T D L Crosby; G T Williams; W G Lewis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J B Hulshoff; Z Faiz; A Karrenbeld; G Kats-Ugurlu; J G M Burgerhof; J K Smit; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Meta-analysis of the influence of a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  R Evans; J R Bundred; P Kaur; J Hodson; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-06-25

8.  Impact of adjuvant therapy in patients with a microscopically positive margin after resection for gastric and esophageal cancers.

Authors:  Lucy X Ma; Osvaldo Espin-Garcia; Charles H Lim; Di M Jiang; Hao-Wen Sim; Akina Natori; Bryan A Chan; Chihiro Suzuki; Eric X Chen; Geoffrey Liu; Savtaj S Brar; Carol J Swallow; Jonathan C Yeung; Gail E Darling; Rebecca K Wong; Sangeetha N Kalimuthu; James Conner; Elena Elimova; Raymond W Jang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04

9.  Impact of incremental circumferential resection margin distance on overall survival and recurrence in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  W R C Knight; J Zylstra; W Wulaningsih; M Van Hemelrijck; D Landau; N Maisey; A Gaya; C R Baker; J A Gossage; J Largergren; A R Davies
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-04-23

10.  Prediction of a positive circumferential resection margin at surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  W R C Knight; C Yip; W Wulaningsih; A Jacques; N Griffin; J Zylstra; M Van Hemelrijck; N Maisey; A Gaya; C R Baker; M Kelly; J A Gossage; J Lagergren; D Landau; V Goh; A R Davies; S Ngan; A Qureshi; H Deere; M Green; F Chang; U Mahadeva; B Gill-Barman; S George; J Dunn; S Zeki; J Meenan; O Hynes; G Tham; C Iezzi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-08-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.