| Literature DB >> 20697488 |
Kabul C Saikia1, Munin Borgohain, Sanjeev K Bhuyan, Sanjiv Goswami, Anjan Bora, Firoz Ahmed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal radius poses problems for reconstruction after resection. Several reconstructive procedures like vascularized and non-vascularized fibular graft, osteo-articular allograft, ceramic prosthesis and megaprosthesis are in use for substitution of the defect in the distal radius following resection. Most authors advocate wrist arthrodesis following resection of distal radius and non vascularized fibular graft. Here we have analyzed the results of aggressive benign GCTs of the distal radius treated by resection and reconstruction arthroplasty using autogenous non-vascularized fibular graft.Entities:
Keywords: Distal radius; giant cell tumor; resection reconstruction
Year: 2010 PMID: 20697488 PMCID: PMC2911935 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.65134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Figure 1AClinical photograph dorsal (a) and side (b) views, with giant cell tumour of the lower end of radius. Anteroposterior (c) and lateral (d) radiograph (e) saggital MRI showing extensive bony destuction campanacci grade III giant cell tumour
Figure 1BX-ray anteroposterior and lateral views of same patient (a) immediate postoperative X-Ray showing plate and K-wire in position. (b) 18 months postoperative X-Ray showing sound union at host graft junction. (c) 6 years postoperative X-Ray after plate removal showing union at host graft junction
Clinical details of 24 patients of resection-reconstruction arthroplasty of GCT of distal radius and Functional results*
| Age | Sex | Side | Duration of follow-up (years) | Campanaccigrade | Grip strength (%) | Range of motion (%) | Functional rating | Complications | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | Fm | R | 4.0 | 3 | 68 | 63 | G | - | - |
| 17 | M | L | 6.0 | 3 | 72 | 74 | E | - | - |
| 30 | M | L | 7.4 | 2 recurr | 69 | 62 | G | - | - |
| 36 | Fm | L | 2.0 | 3 | 66 | 60 | G | Infection | Healed with curettage and antibiotics |
| 28 | M | R | 5.0 | 3 | 66 | 61 | G | Mild subluxation with fibulocarpal diastasis | - |
| 20 | M | L | 7.0 | 3 | 74 | 70 | E | - | - |
| 56 | M | L | 3.6 | 2 recurr | 68 | 74 | E | - | - |
| 29 | Fm | R | 6.0 | 3 | 60 | 52 | F | Fibulo carpal arthrosis | - |
| 28 | M | R | 8.0 | 2 recurr | 68 | 60 | G | - | - |
| 48 | Fm | L | 7.2 | 3 | 58 | 52 | F | Subluxated wrist | - |
| 27 | M | R | 11.0 | 3 | 72 | 71 | E | - | - |
| 33 | M | L | 9.0 | 3 | 65 | 62 | G | - | - |
| 29 | Fm | R | 5.8 | 3 | 68 | 60 | G | Soft tissue recurrence | Resected |
| 18 | M | L | 10.4 | 3 | 69 | 62 | G | - | - |
| 31 | Fm | L | 7.5 | 3 | 58 | 53 | F | Fibulo carpal arthrosis | - |
| 37 | Fm | L | 2.2 | 3 | 74 | 75 | E | - | - |
| 27 | M | R | 5.2 | 2 recurr | 66 | 63 | G | Graft fracture | United after 10 weeks of immobilization |
| 21 | M | L | 8.3 | 3 | 68 | 62 | G | - | - |
| 55 | M | L | 3.5 | 3 | 66 | 62 | G | Mild subluxation with fibulocarpal diastasis | - |
| 30 | Fm | R | 6.4 | 3 | 56 | 52 | F | Subluxated wrist | - |
| 27 | M | R | 10.2 | 2 recurr | 67 | 62 | G | - | - |
| 49 | Fm | L | 7.0 | 3 | 76 | 78 | E | - | - |
| 28 | Fm | R | 7.4 | 3 | 68 | 60 | G | - | - |
| 39 | M | L | 8.2 | 3 | 66 | 62 | G | - | - |
Musculo Skeletal Tumour Society -87 scoring
M = Male; R = Right; E = Excellent; Recurr = Recurrence; Fm = Female; L = Left; G = Good; F = Fair
Figure 2X-ray – Anteroposterior and lateral views showing moderate subluxation of fibulo-carpal joint with ulno-fibula diastasis