| Literature DB >> 20697483 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mini-subvastus approach for Total Knee Arthropalsty allows a faster recovery. It is traditionally not utilized for obese patients because of difficulty in exposure of the knee and eversion of the patella. We hypothesized that obesity should not really cause a problem for patients undergoing a TKA with the mini-subvastus approach as the anatomy of the quadriceps in the obese and the nonobese patient population is the same. We present an analysis of the use of mini-subvastus approach in obese patients.Entities:
Keywords: Mini-subvastus approach; obesity; total knee arthroplasty
Year: 2010 PMID: 20697483 PMCID: PMC2911930 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.65157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Figure 1APre-operative anteroposterior (a) lateral (b) and skyline (c) views of an obese patient showing advanced knee osteoarthritis
Figure 1BAnteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 18 month followup post mini-subvastus TKR of the same patient
Figure 2ABilateral anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) knee radiographs of an obese patient with advanced knee osteoarthritis
Figure 2B(a) Clinical photograph bilateral incision lengths of 4 inches (b) Post-operative bilateral full knee flexion at 8 weeks post surgery
Figure 2CBilateral anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 18 month, follow-up of the same patient
Patient demographics
| Obese group | Morbidly obese group | |
|---|---|---|
| Total no. of patients ( | 81 | 16 |
| Total no. knees ( | 91 | 18 |
| Varus knees | ||
| Mild deformity (<15°) | 79 | 12 |
| Severe deformity (>15°) | 10 | 5 |
| Valgus knees | 2 | 1 |
| Average height | 153.75 | 149.69 |
| Average weight | 75.36 | 97.30 |
| Average BMI | 33.52 | 43.29 |
| Average thigh girth | 50.17 | 61.01 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 16 | 0 |
| Female | 65 | 16 |