OBJECTIVE: To identify biomarker patterns typical for Alzheimer disease (AD) in an independent, unsupervised way, without using information on the clinical diagnosis. DESIGN: Mixture modeling approach. SETTING: Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Cognitively normal persons, patients with AD, and individuals with mild cognitive impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cerebrospinal fluid-derived beta-amyloid protein 1-42, total tau protein, and phosphorylated tau(181P) protein concentrations were used as biomarkers on a clinically well-characterized data set. The outcome of the qualification analysis was validated on 2 additional data sets, 1 of which was autopsy confirmed. RESULTS: Using the US Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data set, a cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid protein 1-42/phosphorylated tau(181P) biomarker mixture model identified 1 feature linked to AD, while the other matched the "healthy" status. The AD signature was found in 90%, 72%, and 36% of patients in the AD, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal groups, respectively. The cognitively normal group with the AD signature was enriched in apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele carriers. Results were validated on 2 other data sets. In 1 study consisting of 68 autopsy-confirmed AD cases, 64 of 68 patients (94% sensitivity) were correctly classified with the AD feature. In another data set with patients (n = 57) with mild cognitive impairment followed up for 5 years, the model showed a sensitivity of 100% in patients progressing to AD. CONCLUSIONS: The mixture modeling approach, totally independent of clinical AD diagnosis, correctly classified patients with AD. The unexpected presence of the AD signature in more than one-third of cognitively normal subjects suggests that AD pathology is active and detectable earlier than has heretofore been envisioned.
OBJECTIVE: To identify biomarker patterns typical for Alzheimer disease (AD) in an independent, unsupervised way, without using information on the clinical diagnosis. DESIGN: Mixture modeling approach. SETTING:Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Cognitively normal persons, patients with AD, and individuals with mild cognitive impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cerebrospinal fluid-derived beta-amyloid protein 1-42, total tau protein, and phosphorylated tau(181P) protein concentrations were used as biomarkers on a clinically well-characterized data set. The outcome of the qualification analysis was validated on 2 additional data sets, 1 of which was autopsy confirmed. RESULTS: Using the US Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data set, a cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid protein 1-42/phosphorylated tau(181P) biomarker mixture model identified 1 feature linked to AD, while the other matched the "healthy" status. The AD signature was found in 90%, 72%, and 36% of patients in the AD, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal groups, respectively. The cognitively normal group with the AD signature was enriched in apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele carriers. Results were validated on 2 other data sets. In 1 study consisting of 68 autopsy-confirmed AD cases, 64 of 68 patients (94% sensitivity) were correctly classified with the AD feature. In another data set with patients (n = 57) with mild cognitive impairment followed up for 5 years, the model showed a sensitivity of 100% in patients progressing to AD. CONCLUSIONS: The mixture modeling approach, totally independent of clinical AD diagnosis, correctly classified patients with AD. The unexpected presence of the AD signature in more than one-third of cognitively normal subjects suggests that AD pathology is active and detectable earlier than has heretofore been envisioned.
Authors: Elaine R Peskind; Ge Li; Jane Shofer; Joseph F Quinn; Jeffrey A Kaye; Chris M Clark; Martin R Farlow; Charles DeCarli; Murray A Raskind; Gerard D Schellenberg; Virginia M-Y Lee; Douglas R Galasko Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-07
Authors: F Hulstaert; K Blennow; A Ivanoiu; H C Schoonderwaldt; M Riemenschneider; P P De Deyn; C Bancher; P Cras; J Wiltfang; P D Mehta; K Iqbal; H Pottel; E Vanmechelen; H Vanderstichele Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-05-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: I Skoog; P Davidsson; O Aevarsson; H Vanderstichele; E Vanmechelen; K Blennow Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Annika Olsson; Hugo Vanderstichele; Niels Andreasen; Geert De Meyer; Anders Wallin; Björn Holmberg; Lars Rosengren; Eugeen Vanmechelen; Kaj Blennow Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Oskar Hansson; Henrik Zetterberg; Peder Buchhave; Elisabet Londos; Kaj Blennow; Lennart Minthon Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Christin Andersson; Kaj Blennow; Ove Almkvist; Niels Andreasen; Peter Engfeldt; Sven-Erik Johansson; Maria Lindau; Maria Eriksdotter-Jönhagen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn Journal: JAMA Date: 1997 Oct 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen; Clifford R Jack; William J Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie Shaw; Andrew J Saykin; John C Morris; Nigel Cairns; Laurel A Beckett; Arthur Toga; Robert Green; Sarah Walter; Holly Soares; Peter Snyder; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Patricia E Cole; Mark Schmidt Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: John Q Trojanowski; Hugo Vandeerstichele; Magdalena Korecka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Z Potter; Michael W Weiner; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Arthur W Toga; Virginia M-Y Lee; Leslie M Shaw Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Mert R Sabuncu; Randy L Buckner; Jordan W Smoller; Phil Hyoun Lee; Bruce Fischl; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Jonathan A Fauerbach; Dmytro A Yushchenko; Sarah H Shahmoradian; Wah Chiu; Thomas M Jovin; Elizabeth A Jares-Erijman Journal: Biophys J Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: D Larry Sparks; Richard J Kryscio; Marwan N Sabbagh; Chuck Ziolkowski; Yushun Lin; Lisa M Sparks; Carolyn Liebsack; Sherry Johnson-Traver Journal: Am J Neurodegener Dis Date: 2012-05-15
Authors: Jagan A Pillai; Linda K McEvoy; Donald J Hagler; Dominic Holland; Anders M Dale; David P Salmon; Douglas Galasko; Christine Fennema-Notestine Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 2.475