Literature DB >> 20696180

The influence of mood on the processing of syntactic anomalies: evidence from P600.

Constance Th W M Vissers1, Daniele Virgillito, Daniel A Fitzgerald, Anne E M Speckens, Indira Tendolkar, Iris van Oostrom, Dorothee J Chwilla.   

Abstract

In several domains of psychology it has been shown that mood influences the way in which we process information. So far, little is known about the relation between mood and processes of language comprehension. In the present study we explore, whether, and if so how, mood affects the processing of syntactic anomalies in real time by recording event-related potentials (ERPs). To this aim we compared the P600 effect to subject-verb agreement errors relative to correct sentences while ERPs were recorded and mood was manipulated by presenting happy or sad film clips. The prediction was that if emotional state affects processes of language comprehension this should be reflected by an interaction between mood and P600. The results were as follows: first, the mood induction procedure was effective: participants were happier after watching happy film clips and sadder after watching sad film clips compared to baseline. Second, for P600 a mood by syntactic correctness interaction was obtained for the midline and lateral electrodes. The interaction reflected a broadly distributed P600 effect for the happy mood condition and a strong reduction in P600 effect for the sad mood condition. Correlation analyses confirmed that the observed changes in P600 effect were accompanied by reliable changes in emotional state. The present ERP findings demonstrate that mood interacts with processes of language comprehension. Three possible explanations for the mood by syntactic correctness interaction are discussed; one in terms of syntactic processing, one in terms of heuristic processing, and one in terms of more general factors like attention and/or motivation.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20696180     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  16 in total

1.  Interactions between mood and the structure of semantic memory: event-related potentials evidence.

Authors:  Ana P Pinheiro; Elisabetta del Re; Paul G Nestor; Robert W McCarley; Óscar F Gonçalves; Margaret Niznikiewicz
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The Effect of Emotional State on the Processing of Morphosyntactic and Semantic Reversal Anomalies in Japanese: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Masataka Yano; Yui Suzuki; Masatoshi Koizumi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02

3.  Electrophysiological indexes of ToM and non-ToM humor in healthy adults.

Authors:  Mirella Manfredi; Alice Mado Proverbio; Pamella Sanchez Mello de Pinho; Beatriz Ribeiro; William Edgar Comfort; Lucas Murrins Marques; Paulo Sérgio Boggio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Ortega; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Pilar Casado; Alejandra Sel; Sabela Fondevila; Pilar Herreros de Tejada; Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Odor-induced mood state modulates language comprehension by affecting processing strategies.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Bin Zhou; Wen Zhou; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index.

Authors:  Aya S Ihara; Kae Nakajima; Akiyuki Kake; Kizuku Ishimaru; Kiyoyuki Osugi; Yasushi Naruse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The Automatic but Flexible and Content-Dependent Nature of Syntax.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Ortega; Esperanza Badaya; Pilar Casado; Sabela Fondevila; David Hernández-Gutiérrez; Francisco Muñoz; José Sánchez-García; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Yes, you can? A speaker's potency to act upon his words orchestrates early neural responses to message-level meaning.

Authors:  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Sylvia Krauspenhaar; Matthias Schlesewsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How robust is the language architecture? The case of mood.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Dieuwke De Goede; Petra M Van Alphen; Emma R Mulder; José H Kerstholt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-22

10.  Contributions of emotional state and attention to the processing of syntactic agreement errors: evidence from P600.

Authors:  Martine W F T Verhees; Dorothee J Chwilla; Johanne Tromp; Constance T W M Vissers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.