Literature DB >> 20695713

A dual-process account of auditory change detection.

Ken I McAnally1, Russell L Martin, Ranmalee Eramudugolla, Geoffrey W Stuart, Dexter R F Irvine, Jason B Mattingley.   

Abstract

Listeners can be "deaf" to a substantial change in a scene comprising multiple auditory objects unless their attention has been directed to the changed object. It is unclear whether auditory change detection relies on identification of the objects in pre- and post-change scenes. We compared the rates at which listeners correctly identify changed objects with those predicted by change-detection models based on signal detection theory (SDT) and high-threshold theory (HTT). Detected changes were not identified as accurately as predicted by models based on either theory, suggesting that some changes are detected by a process that does not support change identification. Undetected changes were identified as accurately as predicted by the HTT model but much less accurately than predicted by the SDT models. The process underlying change detection was investigated further by determining receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs). ROCs did not conform to those predicted by either a SDT or a HTT model but were well modeled by a dual-process that incorporated HTT and SDT components. The dual-process model also accurately predicted the rates at which detected and undetected changes were correctly identified.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20695713     DOI: 10.1037/a0016895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Context-dependent role of selective attention for change detection in multi-speaker scenes.

Authors:  Christian Starzynski; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes Constantino; Leyla Pinggera; Supathum Paranamana; Makio Kashino; Maria Chait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Melissa K Gregg; David M Weintraub; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07

Review 4.  Did you hear that? The role of stimulus similarity and uncertainty in auditory change deafness.

Authors:  Kelly Dickerson; Jeremy R Gaston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-02

5.  Change deafness for real spatialized environmental scenes.

Authors:  Jeremy Gaston; Kelly Dickerson; Daniel Hipp; Peter Gerhardstein
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-06-28

6.  On the generalization of tones: A detailed exploration of non-speech auditory perception stimuli.

Authors:  Michael Schutz; Jessica Gillard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.