Literature DB >> 20694935

Trunk extensor and flexor strength of long-distance race car drivers and physically active controls.

Heiner Baur1, Steffen Muller, Frederike Pilz, Patrizia Mayer, Frank Mayer.   

Abstract

Seventy percent of motor sports athletes report low back pain. Information on the physical capacity of race car drivers is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum trunk extensor and flexor strength of elite race car drivers and physically active controls. Thirteen elite race car drivers and 13 controls were measured in concentric mode for maximal trunk flexion and extension at 60° x s(-1) and 120° x s(-1). Peak torque (mean ± s) at 60° x s(-1) in trunk extension was 283 ± 80 N x m in the drivers and 260 ± 88 N x m in controls (P > 0.05). At 120° x s(-1), drivers produced peak torques of 248 ± 55 N x m compared with 237 ± 74 N x m for controls (P > 0.05). Peak torques in flexion were less than in extension for both groups (60° x s(-1): drivers 181 ± 56 N x m, controls 212 ± 54 N x m, P > 0.05; 120° x s(-1): drivers 191 ± 57 N x m, controls 207 ± 48 N x m, P > 0.05). Individual ratios of flexion to extension forces exhibited ratios of 0.88 (60° x s(-1)) and 0.93 (120° x s(-1)) for controls and 0.66 (60° x s(-1)) and 0.77 (120° x s(-1)) for drivers (60° x s(-1): P > 0.05; 120° x s(-1): P > 0.05). The maximum strength performance capacity of the trunk muscles of elite motor sport athletes competing in long-distance racing did not differ from that of anthropometrically matched and physically active controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20694935     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.484066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  8 in total

Review 1.  The case for driver science in motorsport: a review and recommendations.

Authors:  Edward S Potkanowicz; Ronald W Mendel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Role of the trunk during drop jumps on stable and unstable surfaces.

Authors:  Olaf Prieske; Thomas Muehlbauer; Tom Krueger; Armin Kibele; David G Behm; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Trunk Strength Characteristics of Elite Alpine Skiers - a Comparison with Physically Active Controls.

Authors:  Carolin Hildebrandt; Lisa Müller; Christian Heisse; Christian Raschner
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain.

Authors:  Steffen Mueller; Josefine Stoll; Juliane Mueller; Michael Cassel; Frank Mayer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Comparison of isokinetic trunk flexion and extension torques and powers between athletes and nonathletes.

Authors:  Amira Ben Moussa Zouita; Fatma Zohra Ben Salah; Catherine Dziri; Chris Beardsley
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-26

6.  Back Pain in Adolescent Athletes: Results of a Biomechanical Screening.

Authors:  Steffen Mueller; Juliane Mueller; Josefine Stoll; Michael Cassel; Anja Hirschmüller; Frank Mayer
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2017-01-27

7.  ISOKINETIC TRUNK STRENGTH, VALIDITY, RELIABILITY, NORMATIVE DATA AND RELATION TO PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE AND LOW BACK PAIN: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Zouita Ben Moussa A; Zouita S; Ben Salah Fz; Behm Dg; Chaouachi A
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-02

8.  Dose-response relationship of core-specific sensorimotor interventions in healthy, well-trained participants: study protocol for a (MiSpEx) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Juliane Mueller; Josefine Stoll; Steffen Mueller; Frank Mayer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.