PURPOSE: The use of education is recommended to teach patients self-care behaviours to reduce cancer-related fatigue, however, there is little evidence of its effectiveness or optimal timing. This educationally based cancer-related fatigue intervention trial, CAN-FIT, aimed to reduced severity of fatigue in radiotherapy patients. METHODS:One hundred and ten participants aged≥18 years undergoing curative radiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive (1) pre- and post-radiotherapy fatigue education and support (RFES); (2) pre-RFES only; (3) post-RFES only; or (4) no RFES (standard care). Data collection occurred at pre- and post- radiotherapy and at 6-weeks follow-up. RESULTS: The intervention was not associated with reduction in fatigue levels at any assessment point. Significant changes were seen with secondary activity-based outcomes: Physical activity participation: Pre-RFES was associated with significantly greater increase in vigorous [Assessment (Ax)1-Ax2: 1.05 (0.24, 1.86) p<0.01: Ax2-Ax3: 1.24, (0.44, 2.03) p<0.01] and moderate physical activity participation [Ax1-Ax2: 1.4 (0.53, 2.26) p<0.01]. Post-RFES was associated with significant improvements in walking levels [Ax1-Ax3: 5.82 (0.07, 11.56) p<0.05] compared with no pre-RFES. Paid and unpaid employment: Pre-RFES was associated with slower return to pre-treatment levels of paid work [Ax2-Ax3: -0.72 (-1.41, -0.04) p<0.05] than no pre-RFES. Post-RFES was associated with decreased levels of unpaid work [Ax1-Ax3: 561.79 (51.21, 1,072.37) p<0.05] compared with no post-RFES. CONCLUSION: The CAN-FIT programme did not significantly improve the primary outcome, level of fatigue, regardless of when it was delivered, however, significant changes were observed in activity-based outcomes. Further investigations into educationally based programmes should target activity participation rather than changes in underlying fatigue to improve overall patient health.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The use of education is recommended to teach patients self-care behaviours to reduce cancer-related fatigue, however, there is little evidence of its effectiveness or optimal timing. This educationally based cancer-related fatigue intervention trial, CAN-FIT, aimed to reduced severity of fatigue in radiotherapy patients. METHODS: One hundred and ten participants aged≥18 years undergoing curative radiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive (1) pre- and post-radiotherapy fatigue education and support (RFES); (2) pre-RFES only; (3) post-RFES only; or (4) no RFES (standard care). Data collection occurred at pre- and post- radiotherapy and at 6-weeks follow-up. RESULTS: The intervention was not associated with reduction in fatigue levels at any assessment point. Significant changes were seen with secondary activity-based outcomes: Physical activity participation: Pre-RFES was associated with significantly greater increase in vigorous [Assessment (Ax)1-Ax2: 1.05 (0.24, 1.86) p<0.01: Ax2-Ax3: 1.24, (0.44, 2.03) p<0.01] and moderate physical activity participation [Ax1-Ax2: 1.4 (0.53, 2.26) p<0.01]. Post-RFES was associated with significant improvements in walking levels [Ax1-Ax3: 5.82 (0.07, 11.56) p<0.05] compared with no pre-RFES. Paid and unpaid employment: Pre-RFES was associated with slower return to pre-treatment levels of paid work [Ax2-Ax3: -0.72 (-1.41, -0.04) p<0.05] than no pre-RFES. Post-RFES was associated with decreased levels of unpaid work [Ax1-Ax3: 561.79 (51.21, 1,072.37) p<0.05] compared with no post-RFES. CONCLUSION: The CAN-FIT programme did not significantly improve the primary outcome, level of fatigue, regardless of when it was delivered, however, significant changes were observed in activity-based outcomes. Further investigations into educationally based programmes should target activity participation rather than changes in underlying fatigue to improve overall patient health.
Authors: Jane T Hickok; Joseph A Roscoe; Gary R Morrow; Karen Mustian; Paul Okunieff; Christopher W Bole Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Victoria Mock; Constantine Frangakis; Nancy E Davidson; Mary E Ropka; Mary Pickett; Barbara Poniatowski; Kerry J Stewart; Lane Cameron; Kristin Zawacki; Laura J Podewils; Gary Cohen; Ruth McCorkle Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Amy P Abernethy; Tania Shelby-James; Belinda S Fazekas; David Woods; David C Currow Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2005-11-12 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Angela G E M de Boer; Tyna K Taskila; Sietske J Tamminga; Michael Feuerstein; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Jos H Verbeek Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-09-25
Authors: A Bourmaud; A Anota; C Moncharmont; F Tinquaut; M Oriol; V Trillet-Lenoir; A Bajard; S Parnalland; C Rotonda; F Bonnetain; D Pérol; F Chauvin Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 7.640