Literature DB >> 20694567

Influence of ultrasound application on inlays luting with self-adhesive resin cements.

Amerigo Cantoro1, Cecilia Goracci, Ivanovic Coniglio, Elisa Magni, Antonella Polimeni, Marco Ferrari.   

Abstract

The study was aimed at assessing the influence of the cement manipulation and ultrasounds application on the bonding potential of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin by microtensile bond strength testing and microscopic observations of the interface. Fifty-six standardized mesio-occlusal class II cavities were prepared in extracted third molars. Class II inlays were made using the nano-hybrid resin composite Gradia Forte (GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan), following the manufacturer's instruction. The sample was randomly divided into two groups (n = 28) according to the luting technique. Half of the specimens were luted under a static seating pressure (P), while the other ones were cemented under vibration (V). The inlays were luted using the following self-adhesive resin cements: G-Cem (G, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) Automix (GA) and Capsule (GC); RelyX Unicem (RU, 3 M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) Clicker (RUC) and Aplicap (RUA). Microtensile sticks and specimens for scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations were obtained from the luted teeth. The interfacial strengths measured for the cements under static pressure or ultrasonic vibration were [median (interquartile range)]: GC/V 4 (2.3-7.9); GC/P 6.8 (4.1-10.1); GA/V 3 (1.9-6.7); GA/P 1.9 (0-5.1); RUC/V 6.6 (4.6-9.8); RUC/P 4.1 (1.8-6.4); RUA/V 6.2 (2.4-10.4); RUA/P 3.4 (0-5.4). The cement formulation influenced dentin bond strength of G. RU bond strength was affected by the luting technique. SEM analysis revealed a homogeneous structure and reduced porosities for both cements as a result of ultrasonic vibration. RU benefited from the application of ultrasounds, while GC achieved higher bond strengths than GA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20694567     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0451-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  20 in total

1.  A preliminary comparison of the mechanical properties of chemically cured and ultrasonically cured glass ionomer cements, using nano-indentation techniques.

Authors:  M R Towler; A J Bushby; R W Billington; R G Hill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity.

Authors:  Michelle L Sensat; William W Brackett; Trudy A Meinberg; Mark W Beatty
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements.

Authors:  T J Algera; C J Kleverlaan; A J de Gee; B Prahl-Andersen; A J Feilzer
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Interface evaluation after manual and ultrasonic insertion of standardized class I inlays using composite resin materials of different viscosity.

Authors:  Patrick R Schmidlin; Matthias Zehnder; Christina Schlup-Mityko; Till N Göhring
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Bonding potential of self-adhesive luting agents used at different temperatures to lute composite onlays.

Authors:  Amerigo Cantoro; Cecilia Goracci; Carlos Augusto Carvalho; Ivanovic Coniglio; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Surface integrity of composite inlays following ultrasonic vibration.

Authors:  A D Walmsley; P J Lumley; L Blunt; D Spence
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin.

Authors:  Bin Yang; Klaus Ludwig; Rainer Adelung; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Applying composite luting agent ultrasonically: a successful alternative.

Authors:  A D Walmsley; P J Lumley
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays.

Authors:  A Peutzfeldt
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations.

Authors:  Carlos A de Souza Costa; Josimeri Hebling; Ros C Randall
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Julia Hehn; Jan Hajtó; Norbert Krämer; Michael Naumann; Andreas Koch; Matthias J Roggendorf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites.

Authors:  M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos; Santiago González-López
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of Resin Cement Mixing Method on the Retention Strength of a CAD/CAM Zirconia Crowns.

Authors:  Leyla Sadighpour; Akbar Fazel; Farideh Geramipanah; Mahdi Allahdadi
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-03-20

4.  Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ján Staněk; Abanoub Riad; Adam Le; Matěj Bernát; Milad Hammal; Basel Azar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration on Structural and Physical Properties of Resin-Based Dental Composites.

Authors:  Abdul Samad Khan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.329

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.