Literature DB >> 20694304

Accuracy of sagittal abdominal diameter as predictor of abdominal fat among Brazilian adults: a comparation with waist circumference.

G Duarte Pimentel1, K C Portero-McLellan, N Maestá, J E Corrente, R C Burini.   

Abstract

AIM: We aim was to compare the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) with waist circumference (WC) as a predictor of central obesity among adults and to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut-off point for SAD.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 266 Brazilians adults (euthrophic and overweight), aged 31-84 years old, of which 89 men and 177 women, was carried out. Anthropometric measurements such as SAD, weight, height, waist and hip circumferences, waist and hip ratio, body mass index, body fat percentage were performed. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cut off point for SAD as a predictor of central obesity. Statistical analysis were considered significant with a value of p < 0.05.
RESULTS: The SAD measurement was positively correlated with WC for both genders, although stronger among overweight and obesity women (r = 0.71; p < 0.001 and r = 0.79; p < 0.001, respectively) than men. ROC curves identified the best cut-off points for SAD of 23.1 cm and 20.1 cm for men and women (96% and 85% sensitivity, 86% and 84% specificity, respectively).
CONCLUSION: SAD measurement may be used as an anthropometric tool to identify central obesity among women for presenting adequate sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20694304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Hosp        ISSN: 0212-1611            Impact factor:   1.057


  5 in total

1.  Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Surrogate Marker of Insulin Resistance in an Admixtured Population--Brazilian Metabolic Syndrome Study (BRAMS).

Authors:  Ana Carolina J Vasques; Roberta S L Cassani; Adriana C e Forti; Brunna S Vilela; José Carlos Pareja; Marcos Antonio Tambascia; Bruno Geloneze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Sagittal abdominal diameter shows better correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than waist circumference and BMI.

Authors:  Natalia Cavalheri de Souza; Erick Prado de Oliveira
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2013-07-15

3.  Cardiovascular Anthropometry: What Is Best Suited for Large-Scale Population Screening in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Authors:  Hadiza A Agbo; Ayuba I Zoakah; Christian O Isichei; Atiene S Sagay; Chad J Achenbach; Basil N Okeahialam
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-12-03

4.  Bioimpedance analysis combined with sagittal abdominal diameter for abdominal subcutaneous fat measurement.

Authors:  Chung-Liang Lai; Hsueh-Kuan Lu; Ai-Chun Huang; Lee-Ping Chu; Hsiang-Yuan Chuang; Kuen-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-08-10

5.  Anthropometric and Quality-of-Life Parameters in Acute Intermittent Porphyria Patients.

Authors:  Antonia M Jiménez-Monreal; MAntonia Murcia; Victoria Gómez-Murcia; Maria Del Mar Bibiloni; Antoni Pons; Josep A Tur; Magdalena Martínez-Tomé
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.