Literature DB >> 20693882

Pregnancy does not enhance volatile anesthetic sensitivity on the brain: an electroencephalographic analysis study.

Hiroshi Ueyama1, Satoshi Hagihira, Masaki Takashina, Aya Nakae, Takashi Mashimo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: Parturients are thought to be more sensitive to inhalational anesthetics because their minimum alveolar concentration is decreased. However, this conventional theory may be wrong, because, according to recent animal studies, minimum alveolar concentration indicates anesthetic effect on the spinal cord but not on the brain. The aim of this electroencephalographic study was to investigate the differences in the hypnotic effect of sevoflurane on parturients and nonpregnant patients.
METHODS: Fifteen parturients undergoing cesarean section and 15 patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced with 4 mg/kg thiopental, 2 microg/kg fentanyl, and 2 mg/kg suxamethonium or 0.15 mg/kg vecuronium. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and fentanyl. The electroencephalographic signals, obtained from the bispectral index monitor, were recorded on a computer. We calculated 95% spectral edge frequency, amplitude, and bicoherence using custom software (Bispectrum Analyzer for bispectral index). After confirming that end-tidal sevoflurane had reached equilibrium, we measured electroencephalographic parameters of sevoflurane at 2.0 and 1.5% during surgery and at 1.0 and 0.5% after surgery.
RESULTS: With the decrease of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration from 2.0 to 0.5%, 95% spectral edge frequency, amplitude, bispectral index, and bicoherence values changed dose-dependently in pregnant and nonpregnant women (P<0.0001). However, there were no significant differences in those electroencephalographic parameters in pregnant and nonpregnant women.
CONCLUSIONS: This electroencephalographic study has shown that pregnancy does not enhance hypnotic effect of sevoflurane. These results suggested that the decrease in minimum alveolar concentration during pregnancy does not mean an enhanced volatile anesthetic effect on the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20693882     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e4f508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking general anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Hiroyiki Sumikura; Hidetomo Niwa; Masaki Sato; Tatsuo Nakamoto; Takashi Asai; Satoshi Hagihira
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Remifentanil use for cesarean section in a patient with intracranial re-ruptured arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Eiko Onishi; Akiko Kojima; Toshio Saishu; Shin Kurosawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Comparison of electroencephalogram between propofol- and thiopental-induced anesthesia for awareness risk in pregnant women.

Authors:  Hee-Sun Park; Yeon-Su Kim; Sung-Hoon Kim; A-Rom Jeon; Seong-Eun Kim; Woo-Jong Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Laurence Ring; Ruth Landau; Carlos Delgado
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.