Literature DB >> 20693174

Pharmacodynamic effect of clinical vancomycin exposures on cell wall thickness in heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Warren E Rose1, Ryan M Knier, Paul R Hutson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) have a higher predisposition to select for VISA with thickened cell walls upon vancomycin exposure, but the pharmacodynamic relationship of this occurrence with clinical doses is unknown. This study investigates the impact of clinical vancomycin dose simulations on cell wall thickness (CWT) and the emergence of resistance in hVISA in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.
METHODS: In an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, we simulated 125-2000 mg of vancomycin every 12 h (ƒAUC/MIC 24-225) over a 72 h period against three clinical hVISA and two standard control S. aureus strains. Pharmacodynamic activity, susceptibility and resistance populations were assessed, and CWT was determined at the end of the exposure.
RESULTS: Bactericidal activity occurred in hVISA only with vancomycin ƒAUC/MIC ≥ 164 exposures, but regrowth occurred after 24 h, regardless of initial activity. Following vancomycin exposure, CWT correlated with MIC increases (r = 0.66; P  < 0.0001). A significant increase in CWT occurred in hVISA with any vancomycin simulation, including the high-dose ƒAUC/MIC 225 regimen (24.4% increase in hVISA versus 3.3% with control; P < 0.001). Any vancomycin exposure in two of the three hVISA strains resulted in isolates with MICs ≥ 3 mg/L and as high as 8 mg/L, which corresponded with a more resistant VISA population profile.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose vancomycin exposures in hVISA cannot prevent cell wall thickening, but prudent therapeutic strategies including treatment doses ≥ 1500 mg every 12 h (AUC/MIC ≥ 364) in conjunction with avoidance of long-term vancomycin exposure may avert further reduced susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20693174     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  17 in total

1.  Simulated antibiotic exposures in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model influence toxin gene expression and production in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain MW2.

Authors:  Solen Pichereau; Madhulatha Pantrangi; William Couet; Cedric Badiou; Gerard Lina; Sanjay K Shukla; Warren E Rose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Preferential emergence of reduced vancomycin susceptibility in health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates during continuous-infusion vancomycin therapy in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  Sheryl Zelenitsky; Noha Alkurdi; Zhanni Weber; Robert Ariano; George Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Antimicrobial heteroresistance: an emerging field in need of clarity.

Authors:  Omar M El-Halfawy; Miguel A Valvano
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Altering the proclivity towards daptomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using combinations with other antibiotics.

Authors:  Andrew D Berti; Justine E Wergin; Gary G Girdaukas; Scott J Hetzel; George Sakoulas; Warren E Rose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activity of pulmonary vancomycin exposures versus planktonic and biofilm isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from cystic fibrosis sputum.

Authors:  Nicholas S Britt; Daniel S Hazlett; Rebecca T Horvat; Rachael M Liesman; Molly E Steed
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in an in vitro catheter-related biofilm model correlates with poor therapeutic outcomes in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Wessam Abdelhady; Arnold S Bayer; Kati Seidl; Cynthia C Nast; Megan R Kiedrowski; Alexander R Horswill; Michael R Yeaman; Yan Q Xiong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Vancomycin tolerance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: influence of vancomycin, daptomycin, and telavancin on differential resistance gene expression.

Authors:  Warren E Rose; Michael Fallon; John J M Moran; Joshua P Vanderloo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro evaluation of the potential for resistance development to ceragenin CSA-13.

Authors:  Jake E Pollard; Jason Snarr; Vinod Chaudhary; Jacob D Jennings; Hannah Shaw; Bobbie Christiansen; Jonathan Wright; Wenyi Jia; Russell E Bishop; Paul B Savage
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Combination Antibiotic Exposure Selectively Alters the Development of Vancomycin Intermediate Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Xuting Zheng; Andrew D Berti; Sue McCrone; Melanie Roch; Adriana E Rosato; Warren E Rose; Baiyi Chen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Penicillin Binding Protein 1 Is Important in the Compensatory Response of Staphylococcus aureus to Daptomycin-Induced Membrane Damage and Is a Potential Target for β-Lactam-Daptomycin Synergy.

Authors:  Andrew D Berti; Erin Theisen; John-Demian Sauer; Poochit Nonejuie; Joshua Olson; Joseph Pogliano; George Sakoulas; Victor Nizet; Richard A Proctor; Warren E Rose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.