Literature DB >> 20692913

Percutaneous absorption of diethyl phthalate through rat and human skin in vitro.

A Mint1, S A Hotchkiss, J Caldwell.   

Abstract

The percutaneous absorption of the plasticizer and fragrance chemical diethyl phthalate (DEP) has been evaluated in vitro in flow-through diffusion cells using shaved full-thickness skin from male Fischer 344 rats and human breast skin. Neat DEP (16.3-20.6 mg/cm(2)) was applied to the epidermal surface of the skin, which was then either left uncovered (unoccluded) or covered (occluded) with a teflon cap 2.9 cm above the skin surface. The absorption of DEP through rat skin and into the receptor fluid was relatively extensive reaching 35.9 +/- 2.9% (mean +/- SD, n = 4) of the applied dose over 72 hr when the skin was occluded and 38.4 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SD, n = 3) when the skin was unoccluded. Absorption of DEP through human skin was significantly less (P < 0.05) than through rat skin reaching 3.9 +/- 1.2% (mean +/- SD, n = 4) of the applied dose over 72 hr when the skin was occluded and 4.8 +/- 0.7% (mean +/- SD, n = 3) when the skin was unoccluded. Occlusion of the skin did not significantly alter the percutaneous absorption of DEP through rat or human skin. There was a four-fold variation in absorption between skin samples taken from human donors, ranging from 1.6 +/- 1.2% (mean +/- SD, n = 3) to 8.7 +/- 3.9% (mean +/- SD, n = 6) at 72 hr. This inter-individual variation was greater than the variation between animals, which ranged from 26.4 +/- 3.3% (mean +/- SD, n = 4) to 38.9 +/- 0.6% (mean +/- SD, n = 5). This information may be of significance for the safety evaluation of DEP for occupational and consumer use. Although human in vivo data are lacking, the percutaneous absorption of DEP through rat skin in vitro compares well with rat in vivo data from the literature, which supports the use of this technique as a model for in vivo absorption.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 20692913     DOI: 10.1016/0887-2333(94)90190-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  6 in total

1.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Shannon Bell; Nicole Kleinstreuer; David Allen; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Judy Strickland
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.446

2.  Hair relaxer use and risk of uterine leiomyomata in African-American women.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Julie R Palmer; David Reich; Yvette C Cozier; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Diethyl phthalate (DEP) perturbs nitrogen metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Corinna Jie Hui Goh; Liang Cui; Jin Huei Wong; Jacqueline Lewis; Megan Goh; Kiat Whye Kong; Lay Kien Yang; Mohammad Alfatah; Yoganathan Kanagasundaram; Shawn Hoon; Prakash Arumugam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Exposure to phthalates and breast cancer risk in northern Mexico.

Authors:  Lizbeth López-Carrillo; Raúl U Hernández-Ramírez; Antonia M Calafat; Luisa Torres-Sánchez; Marcia Galván-Portillo; Larry L Needham; Rubén Ruiz-Ramos; Mariano E Cebrián
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16

6.  Personal care product use predicts urinary concentrations of some phthalate monoesters.

Authors:  Susan M Duty; Robin M Ackerman; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.