Literature DB >> 20692187

Clinical experiences of digital model surgery and the rapid-prototyped wafer for maxillary orthognathic surgery.

Bong Chul Kim1, Chae Eun Lee, Wonse Park, Moon-Key Kim, Piao Zhengguo, Hyung-Seog Yu, Choong Kook Yi, Sang-Hwy Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to present our clinical experience regarding the production and accuracy of digitally printed wafers for maxillary movement during the bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Fifty-five consecutive patients requiring maxillary orthognathic surgery were included in this study. The plan for digital model surgery (DMS) was dictated by the surgical plans for each clinical case. We carried out digital model mounting, DMS, wafer printing, and confirmation of the accuracy of the procedure.
RESULTS: Moving the reference points to the target position in DMS involved a mean error of 0.00-0.09 mm. The mean errors confirmed by the model remounting procedure with the printed wafer by DMS were 0.18-0.40 mm (for successful cases; n = 42) and 0.03-1.04 mm (for poor cases; n = 3).
CONCLUSION: The accuracies of the wafers by DMS were similar to those for wafers produced by manual model surgery, although they were less accurate than those produced by DMS alone. The rapid-prototyped interocclusal wafer produced with the aid of DMS can be an alternative procedure for maxillary orthognathic surgery.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20692187     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  6 in total

1.  Surgery-first approach using a three-dimensional virtual setup and surgical simulation for skeletal Class III correction.

Authors:  Joon Im; Sang Hoon Kang; Ji Yeon Lee; Moon Key Kim; Jung Hoon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Laboratorial Comparative Study of the Accuracy Between Virtual Planning and Erickson's Platform.

Authors:  Maysa Nogueira de Barros Melo; Ítalo Miranda do Vale Pereira; Alexander Tadeu Sverzut; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2022-01-17

3.  Effect of occlusal coverage depths on the precision of 3D-printed orthognathic surgical splints.

Authors:  Yipeng Wang; Peiqi Wang; Xiang Xiang; Hui Xu; Yuting Tang; Yumeng Zhou; Ding Bai; Chaoran Xue
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 4.  Emerging Applications of Bedside 3D Printing in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren M Rozen; Paul G McMenamin; Michael W Findlay; Robert T Spychal; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-06-16

5.  A New 3D Tool for Assessing the Accuracy of Bimaxillary Surgery: The OrthoGnathicAnalyser.

Authors:  Frank Baan; Jeroen Liebregts; Tong Xi; Ruud Schreurs; Martien de Koning; Stefaan Bergé; Thomas Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.